New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
My point is now its all about your noble quest to save MXRoute from becoming Microsoft mail, not your quest to get your email
Can we atleast say, “Op delivered”😂
That wasn't a good joke... a good joke is...
It's okay to have PMS once in a while. Even males have some degree of Estrogen. Besides, it lets out stress.
Just don't go PMSing perpetually. Now, that's a mental condition and a possible reason for going under a gender alteration.
Where PMS starts and where fanboy'izm finishes?
666
I'm of the opinion that it shouldn't be dropped but sent to the spam folder.
Spam is a real problem but false positives are also a real problem as well.
Just send it to spam and delete the spam every 100 days how hard is that?
you do realize that the SPF record itself might tell the receiving mail server how to handle mails from not included servers and therefore the (hard) fail might be just because the mailserver is honoring what the (wrongly configured) SPF record asks for?
Google is not suitable for business
I try to send message from my server to mailbox with Gsuite and receive nice greeting:
What the actual F?! How many emails was dropped like this?! I go to their castrated Settings page and try to tinker with it and add whitelist. Of course it does not do anything
Now I come here and create lowend support ticket. I hereby summon no one, because they don't talk to people.
I'd agree if I hadn't personally dealt with the other side of it at scale. HostGator machines falling over from the load of catchall email accounts using millions of inodes because they never rejected any inbound mail for any reason, not even invalid recipient. Due to them consistently being accepted, randomly generated names @ their domains were then sold on lists of valid addresses, causing their inbound spam to multiply exponentially until crisis, all for lack of ever rejecting anything.
There has to be balance, or you create new problems. You reject some email for reasons similar to why your DDOS protection system drops some connections. That's just the nature of the internet right now, not every connection is good and if you don't intelligently filter things then you can't exist once someone decides to be malicious against you.
The key is, with email, you have to reject it with a message so the sender knows it happened.
So, any comments why do you drop soft-fail SPF? Any comments on generic bounce message? And how about that spam filter?
Anyways:
Whitelist goes off of the MAIL FROM declared before DATA in the SMTP transaction. You'll see this as envelope from, and it often isn't the same as the cosmetic From header added in the DATA stream.
Rejection happens at an rspamd score of 15 unless otherwise overridden by something here: https://github.com/mxroute/rspamd_rules
Always happy to review for any claims of false positive. It's designed to prefer receiving spam over false positives, but every day is a new day.
It would have to be more than that. Changing that may have simply tipped the scale enough.
Are you in power to change bounce message to something like "yo mofo, check dat spf"? That would resolve few problems and would help mail server admins a lot.
Don't listen to @JarLard.
He's stupid! He himself said so! I've even laminated it in my sig!
It would have to be a new iteration of the inbound system. It's not off the table.
Can you verify my claim that soft-fail SPF invoke message rejection? Just ~all
It does not. However, every rspamd test against an email has an opportunity to add a score. Generally any one single rule causing rejection is something I've made and it's in the GitHub repo. The default rules don't really do that, only a collection of them building up to a score of 15 would do that.
And that's relevant, because the scores not defined in that GitHub repo are defaults, which means your email would face similar when being sent to any server running rspamd.
Can I turn off spam filter per domain? I feel mazohystic.
Mostly, in your settings, but there's still a layer above it that you can't. You can contribute to the global filter though, or ask me to give you a report on a specific event of it and determine whether or not it justifies an action on my part to change it.
Completely turning off a spam filter arguably hurts other people on a shared platform when you start getting 600TB of malware filling up your inbox
Thank you for answers.
Email is service which requires maximum amount of transparency and very clear policies. In this case I missed documentation.
Overall, ignoring this incident, service is suficient for casual use.
Mass of fanboyz shows that the service is popular
congrats
definitely go with ElasticEmail, 100 times better than mxroute
I am not a fanboy of a jar.
I am just able to smell PMS. That's all.
How is it? Reminds of vinegar?
Any 600TB email hosting plans around?
With a side of fish.
First of all, I see whether there is logic in the user's writing.
If it is lacking, then its leading to either PMS or language barrier. In your case, there is no language barrier, so I leaned toward PMS.
Reading further into your first post, it's clear that you were just spewing out words in anger while providing virtually no other evidence than "rejected".
Thus, PMS.
I submit that rather than anger or PMS, @LTniger knows the LET algorithm and, out of kindness, wanted to pay for my date with the wife Thursday night.
A negative thread increases sales better than a positive one.
Thus, the end is nigh.