New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Thats a great poll!
Thanks, all fixed!
If you have the option, go dedicated. You can always go virtual on the dedicated if needed.
I think with Cloud solutions you can take advantage of automated backups or even high availability storage options.
+1 for a dedicated server.
VPS may be oversold and resources[cpu/ram/disk/bandwidth/portspeed] share with other VPS but in dedicated all resources only you and your customer use.
in peak time VPS may be slower from the cheap low-cost providers.
Thanks, I was thinking VPS as it reduces the hardware headache..... The VPs is nvme and storage always seems pretty quick.
We know the difference but just to add note that OVH's VPS is not oversold. It has good performance. At least based on our recent test.
I would NOT put all of them on one server in anyway... just to avoid 'all eggs in one basket' situation.
Dividing the sites into 3 or 4 VPSs would have:
1. Better fault tolerance and redundancy
2. Isolation & ability to isolate problem sites, incase one misbehaves.
3. might turn out cheaper than maintaining one big server
4. peace of mind...period!!
just my 2 cents... good luck
I know what you mean, and I use to think that but more servers is more expense in software, backup and management.