All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
comparison SSDnodes vs. Nexus bytes perfo (and others)
Hello guys,
this is comparison of performance between my SSDnodes "super fast 10x more performance NVMe", and real fast VPS by Nexus bytes, numbers says for all below..
What is your opinions? (My is their VPS are oversold and slow - SSDnodes of course mean)
Thanks for your opinions
SSDnodes:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores: 8
Frequency: 2199.996 MHz
RAM: 31G
Swap: -
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
sda 320G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
6.128 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
13.242 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
3.344 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 71.4 us / 954.7 us / 52.1 ms / 1.98 ms
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 4.48 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.09 GiB, 894 iops, 223.7 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 138.28 MiB/s
2nd run: 165.94 MiB/s
3rd run: 190.73 MiB/s
average: 164.99 MiB/s
Nexus bytes / @seriesn :
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor
CPU cores: 1
Frequency: 3593.246 MHz
RAM: 990M
Swap: -
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
vda 10G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
0.408 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
3.658 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
0.653 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 74.2 us / 100.0 us / 1.70 ms / 19.1 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 18.7 k requests in 5.00 s, 4.57 GiB, 3.74 k iops, 935.5 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 1811.98 MiB/s
2nd run: 1907.35 MiB/s
3rd run: 1907.35 MiB/s
average: 1875.56 MiB/s
Comments
You get what you pay for, NB may cost more but the quality matches it. Pay peanuts and get monkeys.
Well a Ryzen 3700X and an E5-2650v4 are very different CPUs. Regardless of that, SSDNodes probably has limits in place on all VMs, maybe you could ask them why the speeds are so poor if it really is NVMe.
Edit - @miu A Xeon Gold 6140 is still a very different processor than an E5-2650v4 :P
and for people who want to say me "u cannot compare it with Ryzen"; here is Digital Ocean (SSDnodes so glad says and compare how they are X fold cheaper than DO or Vultr at the same RAM size, cores numbers and disk space.. hmm... but not at the same performance!!)
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz
CPU cores: 1
Frequency: 2294.614 MHz
RAM: 991M
Swap: -
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
vda 25G HDD
vdb 456K HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
1.598 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
5.124 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
1.030 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 136.7 us / 302.1 us / 150.9 ms / 2.17 ms
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 4.13 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.01 GiB, 826 iops, 206.5 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 830.65 MiB/s
2nd run: 830.65 MiB/s
3rd run: 849.72 MiB/s
average: 837.01 MiB/s
Another INTEL example - how looks real TOP PROVIDER with real HIGH PERFO = ExtraVM:
Processor: Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU cores: 1
Frequency: 3311.986 MHz
RAM: 487M
Swap: 2.0G
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
vda 7G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
1.339 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
4.094 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
0.796 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 71.1 us / 213.5 us / 12.0 ms / 189.2 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 8.39 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.05 GiB, 1.68 k iops, 419.3 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 542.64 MiB/s
2nd run: 588.42 MiB/s
3rd run: 555.04 MiB/s
average: 562.03 MiB/s
Hello
Below is your INTEL for comparison ; but u was only faster as me ;-)
BTW: u r real TOP PROVIDER and your servers are really one of the fastest what i seen
@MI>; @MikeA said:
Yes, but have 8 cores vs. 1 core is also different or not??
Mean i compare their "8 core" with ONLY 1 core
PMS detected.
and what is PMS?
Premenstrual syndrome?
You probably often have PMS when you so often mention it here....
@MikeA
TNA cheap hosting (who not claim "our VPS are super fast, high performance etc..")
with E5-2650 (oVZ; 2 cores) SSD VPS for $20 yearly:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
CPU cores: 2
Frequency: 2399.902 MHz
RAM: 1.0G
Disks:
ploop22251 56.3G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
4.178 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
7.865 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 45.3 us / 63.7 us / 18.1 ms / 93.6 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 10.7 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.60 GiB, 2.13 k iops, 532.8 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 503.54 MiB/s
2nd run: 594.14 MiB/s
3rd run: 638.01 MiB/s
average: 578.56 MiB/s
SSDnodes "Performance series" "NVMe" KVM with 8 "cores" E5-2650:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores: 8
Frequency: 2199.996 MHz
RAM: 31G
Disks:
sda 320G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
6.128 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
13.242 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
3.344 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 71.4 us / 954.7 us / 52.1 ms / 1.98 ms
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 4.48 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.09 GiB, 894 iops, 223.7 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 138.28 MiB/s
2nd run: 165.94 MiB/s
3rd run: 190.73 MiB/s
average: 164.99 MiB/s
Absolutely fantastic.
Mine
Oh Hey Fam!
Glad to see you are enjoying your vps and ryzen above intel! 
Hello Magician
Seems Ryzen rolls everything
And sure, you are doing fantastic work yet (0% overselling, 110% performance), so pls stay so FINE and INCREDIBLE! ;-)
NB = rocket speed VPSes
Thanks you for all (one of my fav host, honestly provider, love NB)
@RedSox req:
u should not worry about NB RAM's spedd - all from them is fast as from hell, u can relly on them u get best possbile and all a la TOP:
RAM Speed (495MB):
Avg. write - 3208.5 MB/s
Avg. read - 9386.7 MB/s
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 0.352279 s, 1.5 GB/s
rm: remove regular file ‘test’?
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=129.5 us (warmup)
y4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=214.7 us
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=202.2 us
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=220.0 us
4 KiB <<< / (ext4 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=237.2 us
--- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
4 requests completed in 874.2 us, 16 KiB read, 4.58 k iops, 17.9 MiB/s
generated 5 requests in 4.00 s, 20 KiB, 1 iops, 5.00 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 202.2 us / 218.5 us / 237.2 us / 12.6 us
--- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
33.6 k requests completed in 2.99 s, 131.4 MiB read, 11.3 k iops, 44.0 MiB/s
generated 33.6 k requests in 3.00 s, 131.4 MiB, 11.2 k iops, 43.8 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 74.0 us / 88.9 us / 1.44 ms / 16.2 us
--- / (ext4 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
32.5 k requests completed in 2.96 s, 126.9 MiB read, 11.0 k iops, 42.9 MiB/s
generated 32.5 k requests in 3.00 s, 126.9 MiB, 10.8 k iops, 42.3 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 75.8 us / 91.1 us / 840.0 us / 15.3 us
Nexus Bytes number 1 provider of potassium
@MikeA
Practically the same CPU:
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Xeon-E5-2650-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-2620
but results are very differ:
Contabo:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores: 6
Frequency: 2399.996 MHz
RAM: 19G
Swap: 10G
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
sda 1.4T HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
1.912 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
6.171 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
1.669 seconds
SSDnodes:
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores: 8
Frequency: 2199.996 MHz
RAM: 31G
Swap: -
Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64
Disks:
sda 320G HDD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
6.128 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
13.242 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
3.344 seconds
Is there any other explanation as overselling and unserious excessively resource shares between users?
IMO: Apologize, but when someone writes that selling 8 vCore (shared), accurate adn relevant performance still I imagine otherwise
@WSCallum said:
Looks on contabo example above:
There i pay for it 12.99 monthly => 156 yearly => 468 triennially
SSnodes i paid $ 447 triennially
In both cases i pay as for peanuts, but while in first case i got anything accurate what i excepted and satisfied with it (talking about CPU and HDD1400 in R10, both are accurate to price), in second case i got anything baddish and not matching with what is claimed imo (instead fast NVMe VPS with high perfo i got lazy crep w 320GB comparable w HDD R10..)
BTW: if is here anyone who is Nevertheless interesting in this SSDnodes VPS
(i am not more, lost interest and faith in them).. for example for who is this perfo OK (does not need high CPU or IO, but seeking germany based 10G network, huge RAM etc.) or believe will be able to deal improvement with their support, i am willing give it away to someone for $60.
Actual data are: prepaid till 2022-08-14 (still more than 2 years)
Server type Performance+ 32GB RAM
vCPUs 8
Memory 32.00 GB
Disk 320.00 GB
Germany, Frankfurt 10Gbit shared
BW 16TB
then PM me
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 8 cores @ 2199.996 MHz
Total RAM : 32011 MiB (Free 31359 MiB)
Total Space : 336GB (1% used)
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 104.54 MiB/s | 836.31 Mbps | ping 15.052ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 143.17 MiB/s | 1145.40 Mbps | ping 0.734ms
Hetzner, Germany : 82.77 MiB/s | 662.20 Mbps | ping 3.427ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 83.85 MiB/s | 670.79 Mbps | ping 9.920ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 148.47 MiB/s | 1187.74 Mbps | ping 14.132ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 1.88 KiB/s | 0.01 Mbps | ping 31.205ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 102.48 MiB/s | 819.82 Mbps | ping 12.598ms
Online, France : 113.54 MiB/s | 908.28 Mbps | ping 10.462ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 3.68 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps | ping 20.223ms
ASN & ISP : AS29802, HIVELOCITY, Inc.
Organization : Hivelocity Ventures Corp
Location : Frankfurt am Main, Germany / DE
Region : Hesse
Y r ppls stil support ssdnode like blind? I think racknerd can be better
Before years my 8GB SSD oVZ by them was really briliant fast working...
This was as i did remember them and what confused me, before as i fired with their good looking KVM NVMe offer (i did order it in faith i will get anything similar = fast)..
Many from us learn on own fails unfortunately, i also.. :-/
Probably i am not only or first person here who lost a much money already on bad choices within years..
Hi.. i used Upcloud.. this my referal link UpCLoud. I think its very good
This comment means a lot to us. Thanks for the support.
You are comparing gold (NexusBytes) with shit (ssdnodes). I have been using NexusBytes for last 6 months and in my experience, they are the best. Super H/W, fast network and excellent support. I am one of their "special Thursday" promo customer, so price is also cheap for me.😊😊😊
SSDnodes cheat new customers through their never ending promotions. They used to be a good provider, but in last 12 months, they have become useless. I am using their 4core/16gb ram/160gb ssd. Everything is so slow.
I agree even RackNerd is way better than SSDnodes.
This is problem: I also remember them from past (period with their oVZ) as quite good provider, with fast and reliable servers (my experiences with them before 2 years back and more)
Unfortunately Then, however, it ran with the performance terribly downhill.. At today's level
So this is really bad move.
I'm thinking they're massively oversold. I had all kinds of issues with VMs getting rebooted when I had artificially inflated memory usage and kept my CPUs idle.
I just wrote junk data to /dev/shm/ to consume memory, and it appeared as cache. Routinely within two days the VMs would be rebooted with no explanation. If I didn't do the memory experiment, they idled fine.
Very little incentive (or means) for them to provide a lasting good experience with the pricing/long term/resource allocation model. People see high specs, low dollar ('monthly' FOR THREE YEARS), and a nice website - they can't resist.
It's like the Rent To Own home furnishings gimmick where you end up paying twice the cost for the same thing over time.
I can't fathom running services like this that long. These Xeon chips are going to be worth less than potatoes by then
For example - about what i am speaking - here are 2 benchs from the past, also by SSDNODES VPS - where VPS results are nice and VPS is FAST and i was very satisfied with this VM.
IN PAST: SSDNODES oVZ SSD VPS w 8GB RAM & 4 vcores - PRETTY FAST!!
Then mentioned oVZ was they migrated to KVM (as all previous oVZ, discontinued)
and all performance and other KVMs already start from this time only ran from downhill (in comparison with previous nice fast oVZs..)
Nowadays - also SSDnodes VM (and 4x "higher" plan/config!) - "NVMe" VPS with 32 GB RAM & 8 vcores :-(((( from hell different and degradation in perf:
Unfortunately, really NOT GOOD MOVE..
I appreciate everyone honestly provider who does great work and very glad support them (by both using their servers and also with good review here at every opportunity where is suitable mention anyone).. But for issue discussed in this thread and their move to nowadays unfortunately i cant say anything positive and praise them for this.
I have been away for a while, but just dropping a note that for Nexus Bytes, the technical performance of its servers are awesome, but what is more awesome is the customer service. You get a fast, friendly, and genuine response if you raise a ticket. This may seem like nothing until you have been on the receiving end of some terrible customer service.
All else equal, my pick is Nexus Bytes because my tickets are responded to by people who actually enjoy their job.
I can absolutely agree with u wrote - Nexus Bytes is superb from all angles, all best what u can wish ever (yet, strong believe also remain)
But the same experiences with extraVM / @MikeA - not only performance is also absolutely TOP but support is also incredible - most time u get reply/response within 15 minutes (or less!!)
When we are speaking about fast responding (live, or real 24/7) support (what is extra appreciated in case when u r faced with techn issues) i would to glad (based on my positive experiences) to mention also as great, willing and fast (issue fixing) support from CrownCloud, ultraVPS, inception, hudsonValey, dacentec, hostnamaste and Reliablesite.
Thanks a bunch for the love and kind words fam! @poisson @pkr (I think you are the first one who touched all our locations haha) @miu and Mr. Potassium @dahartigan