Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


sysbench benchmark results for $7 and under DEDICATED servers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

sysbench benchmark results for $7 and under DEDICATED servers

I'm interested to see how these low end servers compare on CPU benchmarks, I was surprised when my Raspberry pi 4 home server has a better CPU benchmark than KS-2E with an Atom N2800. Make sure to put ``` at the start and and of your results so they format properly.

Benchmark command (install sysbench package first): sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --num-threads=4 run

Kimsufi KS-2E (Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2800 @ 1.86GHz):

sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 4

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!
Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000


Test execution summary:
    total time:                          90.1258s
    total number of events:              10000
    total time taken by event execution: 360.4430
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                 23.51ms
         avg:                                 36.04ms
         max:                                154.11ms
         approx.  95 percentile:              58.16ms

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           2500.0000/40.84
    execution time (avg/stddev):   90.1107/0.01

Raspberry Pi 4 B 2GB (Broadcom BCM2711B0 quad-core A72 (ARMv8-A) 64-bit @ 1.5GHz):

sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 4

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!
Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000


Test execution summary:
    total time:                          62.6571s
    total number of events:              10000
    total time taken by event execution: 250.5635
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                 24.42ms
         avg:                                 25.06ms
         max:                                 72.70ms
         approx.  95 percentile:              25.08ms

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           2500.0000/2.92
    execution time (avg/stddev):   62.6409/0.01

Comments

  • SoYouStart ARM box (I only did two threads since there are only two cores):

    Test execution summary:
        total time:                          288.6728s
        total number of events:              10000
        total time taken by event execution: 577.2823
        per-request statistics:
             min:                                 54.14ms
             avg:                                 57.73ms
             max:                                143.43ms
             approx.  95 percentile:              75.39ms
    
    Threads fairness:
        events (avg/stddev):           5000.0000/28.00
        execution time (avg/stddev):   288.6412/0.02
    
    
    Thanked by 1Creativity
  • hmm, tried to install sysbench but the deps seem broken on debian 10.2..

  • I think the hardware performance is one part of the story. You run into fewer issues administering the server with Intel CPUs in general compared to ARM.

    Thanked by 1Creativity
  • poisson said: administering the server

    Agree. ARM still need more time to become more popular in the server space.

Sign In or Register to comment.