All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Small Review of BUYVM KVM SLICE 512 Luxembourg
Hello. I had ordered BUYVM KVM SLICE 512 Luxembourg about 6 month ago. Now writing small review.
Most of LET user know about BUYVM / frantech Solutions as quality, cheap provider and i can confirm that is true. I have no problem with them that 6 month. Was 2 downtime in 6 month, first downtime was planned (about 30 min), second was not planed about 5 min. Network is greate for me but 1 year ago was better then now for my mind. i had 100 Mbit/s from 100Mbit/s over OpenVPN. Today i can get about 70-80Mbits/s but price today are lower because of new offer KVM SLICE 512 20/year.
I can't said about other KVM in others locations but KVM in LU are quality and cheap. I think you can't find any KVM in LU for that price and with that quality.
That why I thinks that BUYVM / frantech Solutions great. Thanks to @Francisco for that great offer in Luxembourg and that you are such awesome provider .
BUYVM KVM SLICE 512 Luxembourg
1 core 512 mb ram 512 mb swap 10 gb SSD 1 ipv4 1gbps port speed Unlim traffic 2/mo or 10/6mo or 20/year
My Internet Speed connection
110Mbits/s / 50 Mbits/s
Ping 40ms from East Europe (my location)
Privacy Benchmarks
Danted Proxy Speed from East Europe
100 Mbits/s / 50 Mbits/s
ShadowSocks from East Europe
90-100 Mbits/s / 45 Mbits/s
OpenVPN AES128+SHA256 from East Europe (Angristan OpenVPN Script)
Single Connection 30-50 Mbits/s / 13 Mbits/s
Multi Connection 60-80 Mbits/s / 30-50 Mbits/s
OpenVPN Benchmark - https://pastebin.com/1i2ysGAm
aes-128-cbc, 3200/8,213 = 389,62 Mbps
aes-256-cbc, 3200/8,073 = 396,38 Mbps
aes-128-gcm, 3200/7,220 = 443,21 Mbps
aes-256-gcm, 3200/7,151 = 447,49 Mbps
OpenSSL SpeedTest - https://pastebin.com/hMkRf6SJ
Common Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/11701777
ServerScope.io - https://serverscope.io/trials/GA7Y
CPU
root@s6:~# lscpu Архитектура:x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Порядок байт:Little Endian CPU(s): 1 On-line CPU(s) list: 0 Thread(s) per core: 1 Ядер на сокет:1 Сокетов: 1 NUMA node(s): 1 ID прроизводителя:GenuineIntel Семейство ЦПУ:6 Модель: 60 Имя модели: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz Степпинг: 3 CPU MHz: 3500.020 BogoMIPS: 7000.04 Разработчик гипервизора:KVM Тип виртуализации:полный L1d cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache: 256K L3 cache: 8192K NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0 Флаги: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm invpcid_single kaiser fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid xsaveopt
bench.sh
root@s6:~# wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 3500.020 MHz Total size of Disk : 9.3 GB (1.6 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 492 MB (63 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 10 min Load average : 0,00, 0,00, 0,00 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.9.0-9-amd64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 263 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 451 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 360 MB/s Average I/O speed : 358.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 3.38MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 1.59MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.65MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 3.35MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 41.8MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 9.80MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 5.09MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 3.32MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 16.6MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 2.35MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 2.63MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
nench.sh
root@s6:~# (wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash; wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash) 2>&1 | tee nench.log ------------------------------------------------- nench.sh v2019.03.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh benchmark timestamp: 2019-06-16 20:05:25 UTC ------------------------------------------------- Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz CPU cores: 1 Frequency: 3500.020 MHz RAM: 492M Swap: 511M Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 x86_64 Disks: vda 10G HDD CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB 5,529 seconds CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB 10,961 seconds CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB 2,223 seconds ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 26.0 us / 222.8 us / 13.2 ms / 488.1 us ioping: sequential read speed generated 13.1 k requests in 5.00 s, 3.20 GiB, 2.62 k iops, 654.4 MiB/s dd: sequential write speed 1st run: 312.81 MiB/s 2nd run: 254.63 MiB/s 3rd run: 328.06 MiB/s average: 298.50 MiB/s IPv4 speedtests your IPv4: 104.244.72.xxxx Cachefly CDN: 48.09 MiB/s Leaseweb (NL): 18.25 MiB/s Softlayer DAL (US): 3.57 MiB/s Online.net (FR): 19.90 MiB/s OVH BHS (CA): 2.14 MiB/s No IPv6 connectivity detected ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- nench.sh v2019.03.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh benchmark timestamp: 2019-06-16 20:06:42 UTC ------------------------------------------------- Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz CPU cores: 1 Frequency: 3500.020 MHz RAM: 492M Swap: 511M Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 x86_64 Disks: vda 10G HDD CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB 5,151 seconds CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB 8,012 seconds CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB 1,961 seconds ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 22.3 us / 203.4 us / 13.9 ms / 494.1 us ioping: sequential read speed generated 14.2 k requests in 5.00 s, 3.47 GiB, 2.84 k iops, 711.1 MiB/s dd: sequential write speed 1st run: 228.88 MiB/s 2nd run: 255.58 MiB/s 3rd run: 372.89 MiB/s average: 285.78 MiB/s IPv4 speedtests your IPv4: 104.244.72.xxxx Cachefly CDN: 50.13 MiB/s Leaseweb (NL): 41.07 MiB/s Softlayer DAL (US): 5.47 MiB/s Online.net (FR): 21.79 MiB/s OVH BHS (CA): 3.23 MiB/s No IPv6 connectivity detected -------------------------------------------------
SpeedTest
root@s6:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from FranTech Solutions (104.244.***.***)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Datacenter Luxembourg S.A (Luxembourg) [19.64 km]: 32.775 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 74.31 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................................................................................................... Upload: 213.12 Mbit/s root@s6:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from FranTech Solutions (104.244.***.***)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by TANGO SA (Bertrange) [19.19 km]: 6.409 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 436.38 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................................................................................................... Upload: 427.32 Mbit/s root@s6:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from FranTech Solutions (104.244.***.***)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by TANGO SA (Bertrange) [19.19 km]: 5.926 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 440.54 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................................................................................................... Upload: 312.84 Mbit/s
iperf3 from my location EastEurope to VPS
user@userpc:~$ iperf3 -c 104.244.***.*** -t30 Connecting to host 104.244.***.***, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.1.99 port 55330 connected to 104.244.***.*** port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 15.4 MBytes 129 Mbits/sec 875 259 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 6.79 MBytes 56.9 Mbits/sec 1368 230 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 5.74 MBytes 48.1 Mbits/sec 0 256 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 5.33 MBytes 44.7 Mbits/sec 13 194 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.72 MBytes 39.6 Mbits/sec 0 213 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.04 MBytes 42.3 Mbits/sec 0 222 KBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 5.42 MBytes 45.4 Mbits/sec 0 239 KBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.90 MBytes 49.5 Mbits/sec 0 252 KBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 5.97 MBytes 50.1 Mbits/sec 0 263 KBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 6.29 MBytes 52.8 Mbits/sec 0 275 KBytes [ 4] 10.00-11.00 sec 6.51 MBytes 54.6 Mbits/sec 0 291 KBytes [ 4] 11.00-12.00 sec 6.65 MBytes 55.8 Mbits/sec 47 217 KBytes [ 4] 12.00-13.00 sec 4.02 MBytes 33.7 Mbits/sec 11 174 KBytes [ 4] 13.00-14.00 sec 4.21 MBytes 35.3 Mbits/sec 0 186 KBytes [ 4] 14.00-15.00 sec 4.46 MBytes 37.4 Mbits/sec 0 198 KBytes [ 4] 15.00-16.00 sec 4.83 MBytes 40.5 Mbits/sec 0 213 KBytes [ 4] 16.00-17.00 sec 5.17 MBytes 43.4 Mbits/sec 0 229 KBytes [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 5.50 MBytes 46.2 Mbits/sec 0 244 KBytes [ 4] 18.00-19.00 sec 5.30 MBytes 44.5 Mbits/sec 5 187 KBytes [ 4] 19.00-20.00 sec 4.91 MBytes 41.1 Mbits/sec 0 221 KBytes [ 4] 20.00-21.00 sec 5.30 MBytes 44.5 Mbits/sec 0 240 KBytes [ 4] 21.00-22.00 sec 4.48 MBytes 37.6 Mbits/sec 2 187 KBytes [ 4] 22.00-23.00 sec 4.22 MBytes 35.4 Mbits/sec 1 142 KBytes [ 4] 23.00-24.00 sec 3.31 MBytes 27.7 Mbits/sec 0 159 KBytes [ 4] 24.00-25.00 sec 3.81 MBytes 32.0 Mbits/sec 0 172 KBytes [ 4] 25.00-26.00 sec 4.14 MBytes 34.7 Mbits/sec 0 188 KBytes [ 4] 26.00-27.00 sec 4.59 MBytes 38.5 Mbits/sec 0 206 KBytes [ 4] 27.00-28.00 sec 5.04 MBytes 42.3 Mbits/sec 0 222 KBytes [ 4] 28.00-29.00 sec 5.36 MBytes 44.9 Mbits/sec 0 240 KBytes [ 4] 29.00-30.00 sec 5.77 MBytes 48.4 Mbits/sec 0 253 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 164 MBytes 45.9 Mbits/sec 2322 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 161 MBytes 44.9 Mbits/secreceiver iperf Done. user@userpc:~$ iperf3 -c 104.244.***.*** -t30 -R Connecting to host 104.244.***.***, port 5201 Reverse mode, remote host 104.244.***.*** is sending [ 4] local 192.168.1.99 port 55338 connected to 104.244.***.*** port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.5 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 22.1 MBytes 186 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.9 MBytes 109 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.8 MBytes 98.8 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.6 MBytes 97.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 11.5 MBytes 96.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 8.91 MBytes 74.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.49 MBytes 79.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.93 MBytes 83.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 10.00-11.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 88.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 11.00-12.00 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 12.00-13.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 13.00-14.00 sec 10.6 MBytes 88.8 Mbits/sec [ 4] 14.00-15.00 sec 10.8 MBytes 90.5 Mbits/sec [ 4] 15.00-16.00 sec 10.8 MBytes 90.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 16.00-17.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 89.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 18.00-19.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 19.00-20.00 sec 12.0 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec [ 4] 20.00-21.00 sec 12.6 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec [ 4] 21.00-22.00 sec 13.4 MBytes 113 Mbits/sec [ 4] 22.00-23.00 sec 14.0 MBytes 117 Mbits/sec [ 4] 23.00-24.00 sec 15.3 MBytes 128 Mbits/sec [ 4] 24.00-25.00 sec 15.5 MBytes 130 Mbits/sec [ 4] 25.00-26.00 sec 9.35 MBytes 78.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 26.00-27.00 sec 9.82 MBytes 82.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 27.00-28.00 sec 9.78 MBytes 82.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 28.00-29.00 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 29.00-30.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.7 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 352 MBytes 98.5 Mbits/sec 5174 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 350 MBytes 97.8 Mbits/secreceiver iperf Done.
iperf3 from VPS to Online.net
root@s6:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5207 -t30 Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5207 [ 4] local 104.244.***.*** port 58470 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5207 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.01 sec 62.9 MBytes 523 Mbits/sec 10 880 KBytes [ 4] 1.01-2.00 sec 66.7 MBytes 564 Mbits/sec 0 933 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 65.6 MBytes 551 Mbits/sec 0 984 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 64.4 MBytes 540 Mbits/sec 0 1.01 MBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 66.1 MBytes 553 Mbits/sec 0 1.05 MBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 571 Mbits/sec 0 1.10 MBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 65.9 MBytes 553 Mbits/sec 0 1.14 MBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 63.0 MBytes 528 Mbits/sec 0 1.18 MBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 71.1 MBytes 595 Mbits/sec 0 1.22 MBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 70.7 MBytes 594 Mbits/sec 0 1.33 MBytes [ 4] 10.00-11.00 sec 65.0 MBytes 545 Mbits/sec 0 1.50 MBytes [ 4] 11.00-12.00 sec 67.8 MBytes 569 Mbits/sec 0 1.70 MBytes [ 4] 12.00-13.00 sec 70.2 MBytes 589 Mbits/sec 0 1.95 MBytes [ 4] 13.00-14.00 sec 65.7 MBytes 552 Mbits/sec 0 2.23 MBytes [ 4] 14.00-15.00 sec 66.7 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec 0 2.56 MBytes [ 4] 15.00-16.00 sec 70.3 MBytes 592 Mbits/sec 0 2.94 MBytes [ 4] 16.00-17.00 sec 68.2 MBytes 570 Mbits/sec 0 3.36 MBytes [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 66.0 MBytes 555 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 18.00-19.02 sec 67.5 MBytes 555 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 19.02-20.00 sec 70.9 MBytes 606 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 20.00-21.00 sec 71.0 MBytes 596 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 21.00-22.00 sec 70.1 MBytes 588 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 22.00-23.00 sec 70.9 MBytes 594 Mbits/sec 0 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 23.00-24.00 sec 67.2 MBytes 564 Mbits/sec 3 3.68 MBytes [ 4] 24.00-25.00 sec 64.7 MBytes 543 Mbits/sec 361 2.71 MBytes [ 4] 25.00-26.00 sec 65.8 MBytes 552 Mbits/sec 0 2.93 MBytes [ 4] 26.00-27.00 sec 64.6 MBytes 542 Mbits/sec 0 3.11 MBytes [ 4] 27.00-28.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 569 Mbits/sec 0 3.26 MBytes [ 4] 28.00-29.00 sec 64.9 MBytes 545 Mbits/sec 0 3.38 MBytes [ 4] 29.00-30.00 sec 66.1 MBytes 555 Mbits/sec 0 3.48 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 1.97 GBytes 564 Mbits/sec 374 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 1.97 GBytes 564 Mbits/secreceiver iperf Done. root@s6:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5207 -t30 -R Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5207 Reverse mode, remote host ping.online.net is sending [ 4] local 104.244.***.*** port 58474 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5207 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 21.7 MBytes 182 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 181 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 20.0 MBytes 167 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 20.3 MBytes 170 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 20.0 MBytes 168 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 24.7 MBytes 207 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 29.5 MBytes 248 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 21.6 MBytes 181 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 26.8 MBytes 225 Mbits/sec [ 4] 10.00-11.00 sec 25.6 MBytes 215 Mbits/sec [ 4] 11.00-12.00 sec 30.3 MBytes 254 Mbits/sec [ 4] 12.00-13.00 sec 24.8 MBytes 208 Mbits/sec [ 4] 13.00-14.00 sec 24.9 MBytes 209 Mbits/sec [ 4] 14.00-15.00 sec 22.8 MBytes 192 Mbits/sec [ 4] 15.00-16.00 sec 19.7 MBytes 166 Mbits/sec [ 4] 16.00-17.00 sec 22.2 MBytes 187 Mbits/sec [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 24.9 MBytes 209 Mbits/sec [ 4] 18.00-19.00 sec 24.4 MBytes 205 Mbits/sec [ 4] 19.00-20.00 sec 23.2 MBytes 194 Mbits/sec [ 4] 20.00-21.00 sec 22.6 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec [ 4] 21.00-22.00 sec 21.3 MBytes 179 Mbits/sec [ 4] 22.00-23.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec [ 4] 23.00-24.00 sec 20.9 MBytes 176 Mbits/sec [ 4] 24.00-25.00 sec 20.9 MBytes 176 Mbits/sec [ 4] 25.00-26.00 sec 27.8 MBytes 233 Mbits/sec [ 4] 26.00-27.00 sec 30.4 MBytes 255 Mbits/sec [ 4] 27.00-28.00 sec 30.3 MBytes 254 Mbits/sec [ 4] 28.00-29.00 sec 22.7 MBytes 191 Mbits/sec [ 4] 29.00-30.00 sec 20.0 MBytes 168 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 711 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec 708 sender [ 4] 0.00-30.00 sec 710 MBytes 199 Mbits/secreceiver iperf Done.
Comments
Try Wireguard for speed and ping comparison, you may be pleasantly surprised.
The question is, could you cut through it easily, like butter?
I wanted but i use opnsense as home router and Wireguard gui in dev version only. I'm not good at network configs and can be many bugs that will disturb me all time. And i have about 7 different VPN providers but not one have Wireguard.
Thank you for the review, I love reviews like this where it includes benchmarks .
Thanks
If you ticket I bet I can get the speeds up more.
We've been dealing with a interrupt issue on our nodes due to some buggy software in the latest Debian builds. I've got a fix for it, but I've been rolling it out slowly to make sure there's nothing that catches fire.
Francisco
Hey Fran, these slices look absolutely great. I hope not too many more E3 nodes get built though. Higher core count CPUs are getting more cost effective now, and will allow more smoothing of CPU load. The new Ryzens (coming next month) supposedly have single thread performance as good as Intel.
I'm keeping an eye on them
The problem with CPU swaps is you get people that only want that CPU, so any platform change we do have to be a global swap.
Vultr goes through this where people order/cancel/order/cancel until they get on a CPU they want.
Francisco
I don't think you need a global swap. Just make it a new product that costs a little more than the old one but offers about the same value, based on scaling benchmark scores or by adding a little more ram or ssd. Then almost everyone will prefer the new one (but will still buy the old when it's in stock) and you can gradually phase out the old one.
The new cpus will also allow bringing some price relief to the current higher end plans. The small slices are great but I can't personally see myself buying the current large ones instead of getting a dedi.
I.e. if the new one benches 10% faster, add 10% more ram and ssd and charge 10% more for it, or sth like that. Small price delta and the overall value proposition is about the same. ~~~~
LOL that's exactly what I do, only with VULTR's IPs :-). They're probably wondering why this guy is spinning up 10+ VMs at a time, repeat.
I have tested again because post old test of Geekbench and Serverscope that were made in january 2019.
New One here and they are worse that were in january 2019. CPU score have much lower results.
Geekbench4 #1 - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13574576
Geekbench4 #2 - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13574499
ServerScope.io - https://serverscope.io/trials/Y0eE
You can try, but i'm plan to cancel it on next billing. I'm post here result if you try. Ticket Created #131423.
I'll check it in the morning
Francisco
^^^ Yeah, this old Geekbench from January was indeed fantastically good.
^^^ These Geekbench results are probably more indicative of what one can expect (still good, but not fantastically good).
Nothing changed i think
in speedtest nothing change too
To be clear i use Persepolis Download Manager, it is gui for aria2c and it is download with 16 multi threads connections. My speed when download some file 10-11 MiB/s
Yea, buyVM performance pretty good, I shocked by this too, using for around several months no issues so far. From time to time I see notifications that the server is down, while it's not. Also their buyshared around the same like a VPS in terms of performance personally for me. I was shocked by this, never expected to see something like this on shared hosting, such good performance.
I would like to buy a VPS from BuyVM, but they don't provide Webmoney. So sad for me. I hope @Francisco will solve this issue in the near future.
You guys need to check htop/top when reaching such slow speeds. I had a similar issue on buyvm using their Ubuntu 16.04 template, where the smallest task would run the CPU to 100%. I first thought that its how its meant to be, considering the price. But then I installed Debian 9 from the templates and all was magically fixed. High speeds again, and no more 100% CPU usage.
Had that happen on all 3 locations, and can confirm that Debian 9 fixed it. So worth a shot.
Debian 9, thx
We had a funny one where Ubuntu 18.04 will give poor upload.
I'm thinking it's maybe related to the interrupt issue we've been working at.
I think our current router is just struggling a lot.
I have a new MX204 arriving on Monday and hopefully my HE port this coming week, so we'll see how that helps
Francisco
Won $50 LunaNode credit in the provider poll prize lottery, but in Toronto location. It really far from me. No any idea how to use it. @Francisco You are from Torronto as i know. Maybe exchange $50 LunaNode for 1 year for VPS SLICE 512. My VPS SLICE 512 will expired 1 of july, not planned to renew because not use it but may be couple of times i will use it or something change in future and i will need.
From LunaNode
Uh? I'm from Victoria, not Toronto. Complete opposite side of the country. :P
Francisco
O i meant Canada .
Look you are from nice place if look at pic from this site tourismvictoria dot com
and nice climite:
speed not changed but Cpu score back to normal
UnixBench 1139.1
GeekBench 3191
Can't test if network will rise, because i'm canceled my VPS but you guys post here please when @Francisco add new MX204 router .
Thanks @Francisco because of you so quality provider and stay that quality forever.
You did nothing but i found guy because of you that exchange my prize to what i need. Thanks
Hey @Francisco been using your service almost 10 months. Great support and service.
Why don't you have windows server 2019? It's so beautiful and light weight. In aws it does great job. Have that man - I'll buy some win servers.
Keep me posted if there's anything else you need
Should have more LU up shortly, just getting some other things done before then.
Waiting on details on a cross connect so I can light our HE port.
Francisco
I'lll hopefully work on a template this week
Francisco
Awesome! Can't wait to upgrade my LUX Slice the performance has been really good.
I'm looking at BuyVM for a KVM VPS and almost everything looks very good, really. Looking at these benchmarks, performace is good. Respected company.
But I'm a bit concerned about the connectivity after reading this thread. I am right in saying that the LUX datacenter is essentially single homed behind Cogent?
I think there should be a caveat that the IPv6 on BuyVM Lux is tunneled, despite on the site it claimed "Native IPV6 connectivity". Although in most cases it should be hassle-free thanks to pMTUd, users of VPN (for example Wireguard) have to manually adjust the MTU in order to avoid fragmented packets.