NanoKVM | Free NAT KVM | Multiple Locations

Obelous

@LEBUserJoe said:

@Neoon said:

@LEBUserJoe said:

@Neoon said:

@LEBUserJoe said:
e1767ca5d6d490b31287d120dcbefbe02546736e

Freemont, USA.
100GB Storage.

• Small S3, Internal git & asset management

Nah, not with 100GB.

@sidewinder said:
715c1a6f744480348431e1d6a85e66300f70b6b8

Low traffic, static personal website.

Thank you!

Deployed.

@vuanhson said:
33f73786d5931d94b216351afa5b21b7f80a0189
I plan install following dockers/applications

• Uptime Kuma to provide check from the location
• Searxng to provide search service for n8n
• Tailscale, Beszel Agent

Thank you!

Deployed.

@rpqu said:
a42d457309929da3c5d2436edb9186673756a243
100GB storage if possibel
Reason: additional redundancy

Deployed.

Totally fine, but can I ask why? Other's got 100GB with much less context e.g above "redundancy", I happy to show you our projects, and cache pure internal dev content is 64GB currently we have actual viable daily use for this machine with 100GB of storage.

But that's fine, give to someone else I guess but i've gone through this thread countless seems a little unfair so please remove my application.

Nobody got 100GB, if you need 100GB, you are free to go and buy a VPS here on LET.

And that is totally fine, but mine was the only one not deployed, the other message said 100GB, it was not clarified in your reply so I would say it's safe assumption to be made on this end.

"You can request an additional disk up to 100GB with a reason if available." I read this, and saw many other's request I'd ofcourse still been happy with any-disk but this is why I requested it I don't like to be made to be a fool.

As I said no worries, post said UP-to didn't expect to be the only one out-right denied. So it's all good we have other services actively running of course i've not taken it personal just request my data is removed from your service, but of course who would say no to a free backup-instance, it's not that i'm cheap if that's what is being implied

Were you planning on using it for commercial stuff? "internal", "we", "our" kinda makes it sound like that. If so, dick move tbh.

There's very limited resources, you're simply unable to get it.

it's not that i'm cheap if that's what is being implied

You're here bitching about it so...

I don't need free stuff so I don't take it away from others who might.

LEBUserJoe

@Obelous said:

@LEBUserJoe said:

@Neoon said:

@LEBUserJoe said:

@Neoon said:

@LEBUserJoe said:
e1767ca5d6d490b31287d120dcbefbe02546736e

Freemont, USA.
100GB Storage.

• Small S3, Internal git & asset management

Nah, not with 100GB.

@sidewinder said:
715c1a6f744480348431e1d6a85e66300f70b6b8

Low traffic, static personal website.

Thank you!

Deployed.

@vuanhson said:
33f73786d5931d94b216351afa5b21b7f80a0189
I plan install following dockers/applications

• Uptime Kuma to provide check from the location
• Searxng to provide search service for n8n
• Tailscale, Beszel Agent

Thank you!

Deployed.

@rpqu said:
a42d457309929da3c5d2436edb9186673756a243
100GB storage if possibel
Reason: additional redundancy

Deployed.

Totally fine, but can I ask why? Other's got 100GB with much less context e.g above "redundancy", I happy to show you our projects, and cache pure internal dev content is 64GB currently we have actual viable daily use for this machine with 100GB of storage.

But that's fine, give to someone else I guess but i've gone through this thread countless seems a little unfair so please remove my application.

Nobody got 100GB, if you need 100GB, you are free to go and buy a VPS here on LET.

And that is totally fine, but mine was the only one not deployed, the other message said 100GB, it was not clarified in your reply so I would say it's safe assumption to be made on this end.

"You can request an additional disk up to 100GB with a reason if available." I read this, and saw many other's request I'd ofcourse still been happy with any-disk but this is why I requested it I don't like to be made to be a fool.

As I said no worries, post said UP-to didn't expect to be the only one out-right denied. So it's all good we have other services actively running of course i've not taken it personal just request my data is removed from your service, but of course who would say no to a free backup-instance, it's not that i'm cheap if that's what is being implied

Were you planning on using it for commercial stuff? "internal", "we", "our" kinda makes it sound like that. If so, dick move tbh.

There's very limited resources, you're simply unable to get it.

it's not that i'm cheap if that's what is being implied

You're here bitching about it so...

I don't need free stuff so I don't take it away from others who might.

I think you're unfairly targeting me, and making wild assumptions, i've worked on free projects, and actively host countless free services.

I work with a variety of developers, some co-workers, some friends, some random people that find the same interests as me, often i'm the central hub, my personal funds are used to host much, where there is a deal, or a freebie of which I meet the criteria I see nothing wrong with making use of it, please check through the many pages here of requests, mine was truthful and has a much more legit use-case than countless other's.

I will not further go on here, I know morally i'm fine in my life i've ALWAYS given more than i've taken from anybody, no misguided compass here. The answer simply is no this particular server would have done nothing but provide a backup of a development proxy that deals with domains, assets etc, no commercial usage no project within the dev-environment is for profit.

Also I never bitched, I was purely curious you can see in the initial quoted reply, 2 users asked for 100GB me and RQU, RQU was deployed with less disk (Not actually said in the reply) mine was simply a No, no smaller disk. Of course it's strange to treat other's differently they are going to notice I don't think I should be a target because I can notice.

Once again no hard feeling just hope my data (IP, Username) anything else collected is removed, I truly don't see how i've caused any problem the reason I applied was because I thought the service was interesting, hate or love my contributions to the forum, they are contributions regardless.

Also if 100GB is not possible, no matter your use-case due to resources, totally fine too I get that in this economy... but I'm not the only one that asked, and a moderator can easily update the thread so user's don't think it's possible... Asking for something that's stated meeting the requirements has somehow made me the bad guy.. I don't get it but whatever i'm way over it alrdy lmfao

stupidgenius

@rpqu said:
want to mirror it, it's ok too.
(it's marbles lol)

Hmm, I have lots of @PulsedMedia storage maybe we setup a torrent/magnet of it? I can also throw it on a storage box somewhere too. LMK.

rpqu

@stupidgenius said:

@rpqu said:
want to mirror it, it's ok too.
(it's marbles lol)

Hmm, I have lots of @PulsedMedia storage maybe we setup a torrent/magnet of it? I can also throw it on a storage box somewhere too. LMK.

Fuck, turns out I forgot to make the cron so it dies when the box got restarted. The LLM mistakenly attribute it as dartnode's lol.
Going to double the archiver with 2c4g100GB box from the giveaway.
Will share the magnet link once it arrived