All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
dedicated srv from hetzner - Helsinki vs Falkenstein
@Hetzner_OL when I made tests on your cloud servers it looks like Falkenstein network is much better to rest of europe/world than Helsinki. Can I expect that the same results would be with a dedicated server from EX line? In helsinki dedi srv are cheaper but network is worse?
Falkenstein (ping from Poland 45ms)
`CacheFly 205.234.175.175 92.5MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 7.00MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 7.41MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 81.5MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 74.6MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 11.8MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 11.6MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 9.61MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 70.4MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 7.82MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.56MB/s
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 17.8MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 15.4MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 15.2MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 10.7MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 7.56MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 4.71MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 15.4MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 52.8MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 7.05MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 3.06MB/s
`
Helsinki (ping from Poland 63ms)
`CacheFly 205.234.175.175 72.1MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 7.77MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.89MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 52.7MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 62.0MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 11.6MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 8.95MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 8.16MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 37.0MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 5.75MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 5.45MB/s
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 12.6MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 11.7MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 18.1MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 11.5MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 7.59MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 4.44MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 12.7MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 36.7MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 5.88MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 3.27MB/s
`
Comments
I didn't check Helsinki but I have always been completely satisfied with Falkenstein.
I have the best network performance in Nuremberg but there is no EX line dedi here so I have to choose between cheaper Helsinki with worse network or more expensive Falkenstein but probably with better network. I tested this location via their cloud servers and I don't know if there is any difference in dedicated EX lin servers.
Which script/bench did you use?
wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
curl -s wget.racing/nench.sh | bash
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 109MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 3.28MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.38MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 69.9MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 109MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 7.72MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 12.7MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 11.0MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 99.2MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 8.40MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.70MB/s
Cachefly CDN: 107.65 MiB/s
Leaseweb (NL): 83.10 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US): 12.00 MiB/s
Online.net (FR): 55.68 MiB/s
OVH BHS (CA): 15.33 MiB/s
Hetzner, Falkenstein.
@eol this is from what kind of product?
Auction server, E3-1271v3, 32GB ECC, 2x240GB Enterprise SSD, intel board/nic.
sorry, if it is not secret what price did you catch?
EUR 39.
EDIT2:
good price, you have luck
I know.
@cybertech nice performance, what provider and what product?
Hetzner cx21
Cx11 has better speeds actually.
Yeah CX11 is impressive for the money.
I have cx41 but in Nuremberg, and I confirm that in this DC network is the best. Now I need dedi svr and there is no this kind of product in this location, so thats why I have to choose between helsinki and falkenstein.
My cx41 in nuremberg:
CPU model : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency : 2099.998 MHz
Total size of Disk : 151.0 GB (3.3 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 15664 MB (318 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 13 days, 18 hour 18 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.19.0-1-amd64
I/O speed(1st run) : 271 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 313 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 272 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 285.3 MB/s
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 112MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 8.85MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 9.22MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 108MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 144MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 5.66MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 14.4MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 12.0MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 113MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 9.65MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.04MB/s
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 14.5MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 16.0MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 23.8MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 12.4MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 8.78MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 5.95MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 18.7MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 75.8MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 8.69MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 4.44MB/s
@Hetzner_OL is it any chance for reply?
As you all may expect, it is difficult to provide you with a one-answer-fits-all kind of response to most networking-related questions. Naturally, speed will always be dependent on the geographical distance between two peers and the routing. Data Center Helsinki is not slower, but of course, this depends on the destination of the speed test and the routing.
If you have specific questions about networking performance, I recommend writing a support request directly via Robot or Cloud Console. Our team will likely ask you for additional information, and it's easy and safe for you to share this information using our ticket system, and our networking team will see your message quickly. --Katie, Marketing