Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Provider OK with lots of ICMPs
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Provider OK with lots of ICMPs

Bit of a long shot, but are there any providers that will allow a lot of outgoing ICMPs? (Think millions)

Need it for a AI project I'm building, but that would seem to run afoul of most provider's no portscanning rules.

No actual port scanning of specific ports, just pings to see which IPs are live to study the data over time.

Comments

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    Million per hour, per day or per month? Per month should be fine.

  • Not sure tbh. It's an IP space of 30m addresses. I assume the vast majority of them don't respond to ICMPs so would build up a database of which ones are occasionally online & just ping those regularly not the entire 30m.

    Ideally per hour, which I'm guessing is about 2-3 gigs of traffic per hour if I use 1 byte pings. I assume it's going to be quite heavy on the network stack though since it's lots of tiny transactions, so don't want to do this without permission.

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    IP space of 30m is too much, not sure if anyone can provide that unless you have a very good justification. I am not a provider but maybe some providers can give some advices.

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    havocx said: Not sure tbh.

    Then who are you going to ask?

    Get a dedicated server with OVH, do not do this on a VPS.

    Thanked by 1Janevski
  • LyphiardLyphiard Member, Host Rep

    Do you have a specific budget in mind?

  • AnthonySmith said: Then who are you going to ask?

    It would come down to trying it.

    Bit more research suggests this is gonna to end badly no matter what option I go for. Not worth it for a curiosity project... :(

  • Collocate your own server in local dc. Than you will have more freedom to perform such 'curiosity tests'.

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    @LTniger said:
    Collocate your own server in local dc. Than you will have more freedom to perform such 'curiosity tests'.

    well, only if one brings own IPs and ASN, otherwise I don’t see a difference between a dedicated and a colo...

  • techhelper1techhelper1 Member
    edited December 2018

    30M IPs / 3600 seconds = 8,333.33(repeating) IPs/second

    8,333.33 * 64 byte ICMP echo request packet = 520.83KB per second. = 1.78GB traffic volume/hour

    8,333.33 * 45 byte ICMP echo request packet = 366.21KB per second = 1.25GB traffic volume/hour.

    1.78GB * 30 days = 1.25TB/month
    1.25GB * 30 days = 900GB/month

    TLDR: It's really not a lot of traffic.

  • @techhelper1 said:
    30M IPs / 3600 seconds = 8,333.33(repeating) IPs/second

    8,333.33 * 64 byte ICMP echo request packet = 520.83KB per second. = 1.78GB traffic volume/hour

    8,333.33 * 45 byte ICMP echo request packet = 366.21KB per second = 1.25GB traffic volume/hour.

    1.78GB * 30 days = 1.25TB/month
    1.25GB * 30 days = 900GB/month

    TLDR: It's really not a lot of traffic.

    Not a lot of bandwidth but a lot of tiny packets, if the provider has any sort of DDos mitigation for outbound it will probably get the server nullrouted

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    Above, and it may well generate some abuse reports.

  • And it will generate a ticket.

  • Thanks for the responses. A provider contacted me who is willing to give it a shot.

    To be clear I'm not planning on hitting all 30m every hour. Gonna go through all of them a couple times to work out which ones are responding and then regularly ping that reduces set. Hoping it's sub 1m regular ones.

  • @zafouhar said:

    @techhelper1 said:
    30M IPs / 3600 seconds = 8,333.33(repeating) IPs/second

    8,333.33 * 64 byte ICMP echo request packet = 520.83KB per second. = 1.78GB traffic volume/hour

    8,333.33 * 45 byte ICMP echo request packet = 366.21KB per second = 1.25GB traffic volume/hour.

    1.78GB * 30 days = 1.25TB/month
    1.25GB * 30 days = 900GB/month

    TLDR: It's really not a lot of traffic.

    Not a lot of bandwidth but a lot of tiny packets, if the provider has any sort of DDos mitigation for outbound it will probably get the server nullrouted

    Why not split the load horizontally onto Multiple nodes

  • zafouhar said: Not a lot of bandwidth but a lot of tiny packets, if the provider has any sort of DDos mitigation for outbound it will probably get the server nullrouted

    I'd seriously like to know who nulls on outbound traffic.

    Clouvider said: Above, and it may well generate some abuse reports.

    1IP getting pinged per hour, how would that generate any abuse complaint from the receiving side? It would be a tiny blip, and 500KB/s is not going to cause any abuse on the local network.

  • First-RootFirst-Root Member, Host Rep

    Clouvider said: Above, and it may well generate some abuse reports.

    1IP getting pinged per hour, how would that generate any abuse complaint from the receiving side? It would be a tiny blip, and 500KB/s is not going to cause any abuse on the local network.

    We had a customer receiving an abuse report for sending one (1) ping request per hour to an foreign server. the foreign ids reacted on that one (1) ping per hour...

  • @FR_Michael said:

    Clouvider said: Above, and it may well generate some abuse reports.

    1IP getting pinged per hour, how would that generate any abuse complaint from the receiving side? It would be a tiny blip, and 500KB/s is not going to cause any abuse on the local network.

    We had a customer receiving an abuse report for sending one (1) ping request per hour to an foreign server. the foreign ids reacted on that one (1) ping per hour...

    and i hope you certainly did something about it!

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    @techhelper1 said:

    Clouvider said: Above, and it may well generate some abuse reports.

    1IP getting pinged per hour, how would that generate any abuse complaint from the receiving side? It would be a tiny blip, and 500KB/s is not going to cause any abuse on the local network.

    From the network perspective this can be tens of thousands IPs being ‘hit’ and that can certainly piss some people off if it crosses their threshold and ends up being logged.

  • @Clouvider

    The destination side can drop ICMP, again still a mynute issue. Just like whitelisting SSH.

    Do you not see the numerous amounts of fail2ban emails? They all end up in the garbage I'm sure.

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider
    edited December 2018

    @techhelper1 said:
    @Clouvider

    The destination side can drop ICMP, again still a mynute issue. Just like whitelisting SSH.

    Do you not see the numerous amounts of fail2ban emails? They all end up in the garbage I'm sure.

    It can. So can DDoS victim drop the traffic. That’s besides the point.

  • deankdeank Member, Troll
    edited December 2018

    Please go ahead with this grand project of yours.

    For the community. It will end badly for you but I am sure you worked such minor details out.

    Bring the justice to the world. Welcome to the Nigh sect.

Sign In or Register to comment.