All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
[Christmas Sale] 5420 $34 | 5520 $48 | E3 $58 | @ Seattle
oneilonline
Member, Host Rep
WattaServer, a brand of ONeilOnline is pleased to offer these dedicated servers out of our Seattle datacenter. Please contact our sales department via email or live chat with any questions prior to ordering.
What's included with your dedicated server:
Full root/administrator access
24 x 7 x 365 Server Monitoring
24 x 7 x 365 Hardware Replacement
24 x 7 x 365 Customer Support
1Gbps Uplink on a Private VLAN
IPMI / KVM/IP On Demand
DDoS Protection up to 10GB/sec – Automated Null Route at 10GB+/sec spike
SLA 99.9% Uptime in a Tier3+ Certified Datacenter
What's available with your dedicated server:
Windows Server, CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, and many other OS available!
CPanel and Webmin Control Panels Available!
Managed Server Services Available!
Dual Xeon L5420
16 GB DDR2 1333
500 GB SATA III 7200
1 Gbps Uplink
10 TB Bandwidth
4 IPv4s
DDoS Protection @ 10GB/sec
On Demand KVM/IP
Seattle, WA
Free Setup
@ $34.00 /month
[ORDER NOW]
Dual Xeon L5520
48 GB DDR3 1066
2 TB SATA III 7200
1 Gbps Uplink
10 TB Bandwidth
4 IPv4s
DDoS Protection @ 10GB/sec
On Demand KVM/IP
Seattle, WA
Free Setup
@ $48.00 /month
[ORDER NOW]
Xeon E3-1230v1
16 GB DDR3 1333
1 TB SATA III 7200
1 Gbps Uplink
10 TB Bandwidth
4 IPv4s
DDoS Protection @ 10GB/sec
On Demand KVM/IP
Seattle, WA
Free Setup
@ $58.00 /month
[ORDER NOW]
Network Info:
Network Details and Realtime Status can be found here
Seattle, WA Datacenter
Our Seattle datacenter has the best peering for Asia networks.
Test IPv4:
ping 216.244.77.220
ping 207.244.149.244
ping 162.245.239.130
Test File: 100MB.test / 1000MB.test
- WattaServer is a brand of ONeilOnline, founded in 1994.
- Read what our customers have to say! Customer Testimonials!
- Network providers include Internap, Level 3, Telia, NTT, Zayo, CenturyLink, Seattle Internet Exchange out of Seattle.
- Test IPs, test file links and more info can be found on our datacenter page.
- Sorry, no IPv6 available at our Seattle datacenter.
- Warez-related, Bulk Mail, and Spam-related activities are strictly forbidden. Please review our TOS and AUP prior to ordering.
- We accept PayPal, Stripe, VISA and MasterCard payments. No Bitcoin.
- Promotional offers cannot be combined with other promotional offers.
Thanks for your interest!
Comments
Finally, a dedicated offer for Seattle that might temp me. Unfortunately, you did this after BF, and I've already got some idlers.
Plus, without raid, there's an eventual bad times, and it is older hardware...
You can never have enough idlers.
root@sv39 ~ # wget http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
--2018-12-21 23:11:33-- http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
Connecting to 162.245.239.130:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100663296 (96M)
Saving to: ‘100MB.test’
100MB.test 100%[===================>] 96.00M 405KB/s in 4m 0s
2018-12-21 23:15:34 (409 KB/s) - ‘100MB.test’ saved [100663296/100663296]
root@sv39 ~ #
Where are you located!?! 4m is definitely not good or the norm.
Dedicated Hetzner box, Falkenstein/Germany.
Ahhh that would explain it. We could always try better peering for the server if you were interested.
Well no, it's alright.
I figured the speed would be kind of low but not that low.
King of resellers, nothing new, serverstadium deals.
Download speed seems pretty slow for me, given I'm relatively close to Seattle (San Francisco Bay Area):
~5 times my speed.
I am jealous.
We are all resellers here, in some form or fashion. We offer a lot more features, services, and better support than what server stadium offers. Thanks
We actually were based in SF area for a few years, but many complained of the poor latency for the game servers out of SF and SJ. One of the reasons we moved. Sorry to disappoint.
Sure, but I'd think that I'd get speeds better than 2 MB/s from a server where the ping time is only 26ms, particularly since you're saying that it has a 1 Gb/s uplink. For comparison I get ~7 MB/s from BuyVM in Las Vegas.
Yes, it depends on the peering, location, and server load. Closer to your location the less hops, the better latency and speeds.
nah, I think your stuff kinda sucks.
This is from my dedicated at NewContinuum in Chicago.
This if from my Dedicated in Philly
And just for giggles, here is my Google Cloud instance in Kansas City.
So, unless "better peering" is codeword for "next rack over" I don't know how much better it could be with three different network paths, including Google's premium bandwidth tier, one right next to United IX in Chicago, and one East coast.
Thats that wrapped up.
Seems like u need to be located inside the rack
That probably won't help either...
what's their refund policy? anyone charging back? no way 1gb uplink is that slow.
Yes, I agree, looks like something is going on with the server that is hosting the test download link. We would have to look into it. Thank you
Do I need 20 ips available? Do you offer the extras or limit to 5 only?
Yes, you can request additional IPs. A signed IP justification form will be required for approval. We recommend this be completed prior to purchase, but you can also complete this after purchase.
Oh yea, this test file is kinda crappy.
From Vancouver:
In comparison, here is test file result from ImpactVPS:
Here is a test file result from Virmach Seattle from Vancouver:
From Seattle impactvps:
Initially, failed to download. Couldn't ping 162.245.239.130. I successfully ping the other two test IP's. I then am able to ping 162.245.239.130 and get the file:
From Seattle Virmach:
So two other Seattle datacenters can't top half a gigabit. But at least we know they are not 100Mbps ports.
From LA Virmach:
That LA Virmach number is garbage for 27ms ping time. I have over 42ms ping from Vancouver to LA and speedtests are above 80Mbps, so less than 20Mbps from Seattle to LA is garbage.
Here are what ImpactVPS and Virmach from Seattle to Vancouver does for a speedtest in comparison:
wget http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
--2019-01-14 08:37:54-- http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
Connecting to 162.245.239.130:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100663296 (96M)
Saving to: ‘100MB.test.4’
100MB.test.4 100%[==========================================================>] 96.00M 299MB/s in 0.3s
2019-01-14 08:37:55 (299 MB/s) - ‘100MB.test.4’ saved [100663296/100663296]
This thread can be closed.
root@sv39 ~ # wget -O /dev/null http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
--2019-01-14 17:45:09-- http://162.245.239.130/100MB.test
Connecting to 162.245.239.130:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 100663296 (96M)
Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
/dev/null 100%[===================>] 96.00M 421KB/s in 3m 58s
2019-01-14 17:49:08 (413 KB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [100663296/100663296]
root@sv39 ~ #
EDIT2:
Seems to be capped at 420.
Are you testing from the same server?
LOL no, from our office to the Seattle datacenter, same city.
Test from somewhere else. Everyone here is reporting really shitty numbers.
Just connect it to 127.0.0.1 mate