New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
We don't need say LoL
OMG you another one idiot..
Depending on ISP routes to China are "ok" from Russia - 95% of the other countries in asia are useless as the route will go via EU (or even worse, US).
Problem behind that is that Chinese ISPs do not sell transport from CN to RU, so RU is useless for countries like South Korea, PH or Indonesia.
I do not tell Russia very best connection for Asia.
But much more affordable than Western Europe
Guess those who open this treat talking about a whole continent
it's far from "best" as OP requested as well - It is pretty much only good to China, and even then congested like any other CN upstream. Ping/Latency is a bit lower than LAX though.
@William can you recommend which one suit my needs?
I saw Host Virtual on Hetzner , good?
Rostelecom has good connectivity to China and India.
Yes, from 1000-1700 Indian/Chinese time - Then it is as congested as any link to China until around 2100. 0700-1000 the same.
Again, as i explained multiple times before, NO LINK besides their HK "Direct China" links (at 40$+/Mbit) has enough capacity to fill the need at peak times.
Tried simple tests few months ago from Moscow DC got 25Mbps to HK and 45Mbps to Mumbai India, guess its not a bad. Ping around 160Ms to both locations, probably less ping impossible depending distance
Nah not only that; Japan can be very nice assuming you're on the right upstream mix in Russia (or actually lack thereof, best chances are on single-homed Rostelecom...)
Hong Kong and Singapore too, via the same Rostelecom cables, first going to Tokyo;
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev ... 3. asr3.t72.ru 0.0% 10 6.6 6.2 5.5 6.8 0.5 4. 188.128.93.17 0.0% 10 5.4 5.5 5.2 5.8 0.2 5. 95.167.91.155 0.0% 10 89.3 89.9 84.6 92.5 2.6 6. 61.213.146.253 0.0% 10 232.1 228.3 224.1 232.1 3.0 7. ae-0.r23.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 10 225.2 230.4 220.1 248.1 8.7 ae-14.r24.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net ae-0.r22.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net 8. ae-4.r21.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net 10.0% 10 296.9 313.0 296.9 320.9 8.5 ae-3.r21.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net ae-5.r21.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net 9. ae-13.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 10 283.5 281.4 273.6 291.9 6.3 10. 116.51.27.154 0.0% 10 197.4 196.3 187.8 204.6 5.3 11. xe-0-0-0.cr01.sin-11.leaseweb.net 0.0% 10 197.2 204.9 197.2 223.4 9.2 12. et49.ce01.sin-11.leaseweb.net 0.0% 10 192.2 192.9 186.4 199.3 4.4 13. mirror.sin11.sg.leaseweb.net 0.0% 10 184.0 193.1 184.0 201.1 6.3Can't post nice traces to HK at the moment, some cable between Tokyo and Hong Kong seems to be down as multiple providers switched to not using it, e.g. SoftLayer goes JP->SG->HK, etc.
Cost reasons. LAX<->HK is much cheaper than EU<->HK.
Asia is all about balancing. You need to decide where the priority traffic is coming from and work back from there.
time4vps at lithuania seems fast to me (SE Asia).
If Telia or Tata or Tinet, it may not route USA.
Guess it can be called - reliable - If you drop political influence..
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/4617708549
From my observations, Rostelecom (RU) has great connectivity to China Unicom - basically no congestion at all. China Telecom really depends on which time and to which area. There seems to be higher packet loss for broadband customers when compared to leased lines.
Rostelecom's cable could be via Vladivostok to Beijing.
To China Telecom Guangdong (GMT +8 7:30PM 29/08/2015)
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 95.xxx.xx.xx 0.0% 22 64.2 5.9 0.2 64.2 15.7
2. 87.226.133.1xx 0.0% 22 63.4 64.8 63.1 71.3 2.3
3. 188.254.55.229 0.0% 22 107.4 110.0 105.2 116.3 3.0
4. 202.97.53.73 0.0% 22 100.2 101.5 97.4 107.9 2.6
5. 202.97.53.97 23.8% 22 112.6 110.5 105.1 115.2 3.2
6. ???
7. 59.41.201.146 0.0% 21 147.0 144.0 136.5 179.4 9.1
8. 183.56.31.86 0.0% 21 146.4 151.3 139.3 257.1 24.9
9. 183.56.32.2 14.3% 21 153.3 148.7 139.2 163.7 6.2
183.56.32.6
183.56.31.254
121.33.196.122
10. 183.63.98.98 4.8% 21 146.2 157.1 142.3 175.7 11.8
183.63.98.122
11. 61.144.150.133 0.0% 21 155.4 155.3 143.5 247.6 22.0
12. 61.144.150.133 0.0% 21 152.7 157.7 144.3 245.7 21.2
13. 61.140.99.33 0.0% 21 139.8 140.5 133.7 165.2 6.2
Rostelecom has direct peering with KT and KDDI Japan. Interestingly, SK Broadband is via China Telecom through Rostelecom. Latency is still reasonable.
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 95.xxx.xx.xx 0.0% 47 0.2 4.4 0.2 66.6 13.3
2. 87.226.133.1xx 0.0% 47 63.1 57.8 55.0 64.7 2.7
3. 188.254.55.229 0.0% 47 113.1 110.9 106.1 131.8 3.8
4. 202.97.58.101 0.0% 46 103.9 106.1 101.4 112.3 2.8
5. 202.97.61.34 0.0% 46 139.0 139.8 135.0 146.5 2.8
6. ???
7. 39.115.132.80 0.0% 46 305.0 306.0 301.5 311.5 2.6
8. 39.115.132.73 64.4% 46 299.9 298.9 295.7 303.9 3.2
9. 210.94.22.10 0.0% 46 321.0 308.0 299.8 321.0 5.5
10. 124.217.192.18 82.2% 46 323.8 345.7 271.4 424.0 62.6
11. 124.217.195.61 0.0% 46 215.4 219.4 215.0 287.8 10.8
12. 49.238.200.37 0.0% 46 219.5 213.6 199.9 223.7 7.9
PCCW via Rostelecom's Hong Kong PoP is quite reliable also. Just 135-140ms from Novosibirsk. Similar latency to Tokyo via NTT also (150ms).
From Thailand to nldedicated.com (hosted in Netherlands) i got 261ms.
You can try our looking glasses with test IPs and test downloads here:
https://www.qhoster.com/about-qhoster.html
There are few European locations which will give you an idea.