New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
only allow that type content who ignore dmca.
On behalf of SKB Enterprise B.V. I can offer you the following server:
Managed V2 cPanel
Monthly price: € 70,00 (~ $79,00)
Setup fee: € 0,00
Since this is a custom offer which we don't have on our website, it can be ordered via e-mail: [email protected].
If you're in need of custom offers, please send us an e-mail at [email protected]. You can also look at our other offers at https://skb-enterprise.com/managed/
Datacenter: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Network: AS64425
Why should you choose us instead of others?
Payment methods
Company details
SKB Enterprise B.V.
CoC The Netherlands: 69737770
VAT: NL857990822B01
Website: www.skb-enterprise.com
Sales: [email protected]
79 usd is high for me.
Can you lower the ssd space and lower price?
Note: I already wrote my price.
I can make the price 60,00 EUR (~ $68,00) monthly when changing the SSD to 50 GB.
try ultravps.eu or virmach.com as both providers do Amsterdam location.
does "fully managed" mean they just type "yum update" and "reboot" every few days? Serious question - I never knew what it meant except prices seemed expensive for typing a few words
Hi, we can do
Fully Managed cpanel - £39.99/m - $50.87
Yes i think so. And they charge outrageously high for just that.
A ”true” fully managed also includes installation, optimisation.
Troubleshooting and fixes when shit break.
So the money you pay month by month is ”used” when something needs to be done.
Can you elaborate a bit more? about installation and optimisation?
What kind of shit break we could face?
I used to work for a company that offered full managed services.
You could say that the customer handed over the root login and wasn’t allowed a sudo account. Then the company I worked for made sure that the SLA was followed.
A ”regular” VPS/dedi provider today, their responsibility ends when the server is up and reachable, with a managed VPS, you put in an order to the company for any changes you want to be made (on the system).
Example: ”Block port 443 for everyone, whitlist this ip”.
If it was unmanaged, you do the job.
If it was managed, they do the job. And fix it if it wasn’t done right.
System upgrade that breaks your CMS system? Their responsibility to fix.
And there should always be communication before an upgrade is done.
A ”true” managed company test the changes in a sandbox environment before implementing it on the production server.
Every change is documented on when it happened, why and by whom.
I don’t think you will find a company like that here on LET.
price range is not within LET boundries.
Most important thing for me, be clear with the boundries, I do these things, you do those things.
Who should fix it if something stops working.
You don’t want to end up with service down and the company replies with ”not our job”.
One common thing is the person's site slows down because after a while because of a missing database index or badly written query. I used to fix that for people all the time. Typically our monitoring would catch the slowdown and we'd fix it before they even noticed.
Honestly, it sounds like a bunch of nonsense. If someone is smart enough to know what a VPS is, with a few google searches they can figure out the rest.
At the bare minimum, "managed" should come with a kernel care license, r1soft license, etc so no downtime, good backups. It's like "managed" providers want 50 bucks a month to type a few words in the terminal every few days.
I don't get it, but whatever...