Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


HostHatch Review - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostHatch Review

13»

Comments

  • @Francisco said:
    We have fully managed plans + cPanel coming out in July as well, though it won't be $20/month or something.

    It'll be $7 per month right?!

    It'll be an excellent service I'm certain of that.

  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @Spirit said:
    +node failure & data loss in sweden few days ago :) It happens...

    We use RAID10 in all of our nodes (RAID50 in storage). For the node that failed (SSD11 in STH), the RAID card showed 5/8 drives and after a reboot, it was 2/8. There is nothing we could have done to avoid this. We did not have any latest backups for this particular node (we never advertise backups, but we do take them and have one big backup server just for this in each location), so we quickly recreated the VPS to bring all the VPS online. But for the customers who requested, we did restore old backups. Once again - we do not advertise or promise any backups and it is up to the customer to take their backups, but we still do have backups just in case.

    @Lartza said:
    I've been waiting two days for an answer to a ticket too, last time got a response the same day, before that it was two days too. Otherwise pretty good for the prices, some small downtimes in Sweden.

    Can you please PM me the ticket #s? I can understand the delay if it was a non-urgent ticket and it was a bad time (like now, we were busy restoring the node and all the customers on it) but this shouldn't happen on urgent ones. We put aside all the non-urgent tickets while working on an urgent situation. We're not a very big company so we have to prioritize :)

    zemigpt said: It was hosting a Drupal commerce site, and had about 1000 pageviews/day so it was a normal load. Sometimes my only way of finding that the machine was offline was when I checked the site or had clients complaining about the site being offline.

    Maybe they changed that notification policy, but that at the time put me off.

    This could have been nodewatch, which stops the server without notification, which most providers use here I believe. If we suspend it manually for load, it is usually if the server is running on 'very' high load and affecting others. An email is sent notifying of the suspension. Usually, we notify and ask for it to be fixed first, and suspend if it is not fixed. I think that's pretty normal for most providers. You can always configure something like pingdom to notify you instantly of any downtime so you don't have to find out the other way.

  • k0nslk0nsl Member

    My service with HostHatch (STH location) is still running smoothly and with no issues.

  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @k0nsl said:
    My service with HostHatch (STH location) is still running smoothly and with no issues.

    Thanks for posting this. Only one node (SSD11-STH) was affected, we have quite a few VZ nodes in Stockholm - was there about a week and a half ago and they all look pretty shiny :)

  • lucastlucast Member

    my vps in sweden

  • Hosthatch is a great provider for personal use and for non critical services. We have had virtual servers at almost all their locations, but have moved away due to some bad luck on our services. In Stockholm we lost 3 VPSes, complete data loss as the machines we were on failed badly. In the Netherlands we experienced getting migrated which also resulted in complete data loss, same goes for their FL US location. The support is not always quick at responding sometimes we waited several days for a response, but when finally in contact with them, they are reasonable and friendly.
    I will definitely recommend them, but remember to keep backups - You will most likely need them at some point.

  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @c0urier said:
    Hosthatch is a great provider for personal use and for non critical services. We have had virtual servers at almost all their locations, but have moved away due to some bad luck on our services. In Stockholm we lost 3 VPSes, complete data loss as the machines we were on failed badly. In the Netherlands we experienced getting migrated which also resulted in complete data loss, same goes for their FL US location. The support is not always quick at responding sometimes we waited several days for a response, but when finally in contact with them, they are reasonable and friendly.
    I will definitely recommend them, but remember to keep backups - You will most likely need them at some point.

    I've handled your account a few times so I know what you went through. Unluckily, all of your 3 servers in Stockholm were on SSD11. We can always move them one per node on request. I've explained it on http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/60178/hosthatch-review-stay-away-issue-has-been-resolved (see the SSD11 response please) - sadly not much we can do when 6/8 drives fail at once.

    The issue in US was over one year ago if I am not mistaken, two weeks from when we launched there and had to do with a batch of new bad drives (?) It has been stable since though.

    Thanked by 1c0urier
  • c0urierc0urier Member
    edited August 2015

    Hi Abdullah

    It was not an attack on your business just a notice for users that might consider using Hosthach for critical/high availability services. I do recommend Hosthatch as I also wrote, we've never experienced as good performance as we got from you, we might just have been extremely unlucky with what happened and how long it took to resolved the various issues. I think everything happened within a time frame of 1 year, I am quite certain of it and to add to that, there was a few outages due to attacks on your Stockholm & Amsterdam locations, but you are of course not to blame for that as that was up to the upstream providers.

    Don't take this the wrong way, this is just a follow-up review with our experiences and what others can or can not expect.

    Thanked by 1hosthatch
  • hosthatchhosthatch Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @c0urier said:
    Hi Abdullah

    It was not an attack on your business just a notice for users that might consider using Hosthach for critical/high availability services. I do recommend Hosthatch as I also wrote, we've never experienced as good performance as we got from you, we might just have been extremely unlucky with what happened and how long it took to resolved the various issues. I think everything happened within a time frame of 1 year, I am quite certain of it and to add to that, there was a few outages due to attacks on your Stockholm & Amsterdam locations, but you are of course not to blame for that as that was up to the upstream providers.

    Don't take this the wrong way, this is just a follow-up review with our experiences and what others can or can not expect.

    Yes I understand, and am thankful for the constructive criticism. Just offering some details since I'm not sure if you already know them, we've moved away from Serverius to Telecity 5 in Amsterdam (an expensive upgrade), it has been very solid since.

    Thanked by 3c0urier vimalware bersy
  • @Abdullah said:
    Yes I understand, and am thankful for the constructive criticism. Just offering some details since I'm not sure if you already know them, we've moved away from Serverius to Telecity 5 in Amsterdam (an expensive upgrade), it has been very solid since.

    We did notice a much better stability in Amsterdam, but right after the incident happened in Stockholm. We still have one VPS there and it has been pretty hard hit by the DDoS attack against Portlane the last few days. It was short outages, but that is kind of bad for VoIP.
    Either way, we might be returning at a later time and thank you for the co-operation we had.

  • sipesipe Member
    edited January 2016

    Hello all. I bought 5$ plan for backup data from online and kimsufi dedi for wipe and reinstall.

    Plan, Amsterdam NL
    $5 / month
    1x Intel E5 2.4GHz+ Core
    512MB RAM
    250GB HDD
    1TB Bandwidth

    Installed Ubuntu, SCPed all my files back and forth. Generally I'm ok with server, speeds are usually 10MB, sometimes fall back to 2-3MB, but not for long. Max speed 13MB.
    I didn't know about time4vps, next time I will go with them.

    Here are benchmarks.

    System Info
    -----------
    Processor       : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    CPU Cores       : 1
    Frequency       : 2399.996 MHz
    Memory          : 495 MB
    Swap            : 511 MB
    Uptime          : 6 days, 18:40,
    
    OS              : Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
    Arch            : i686 (32 Bit)
    Kernel          : 3.2.0-23-generic-pae
    Hostname        : hosthatch
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is 176.126.xx.xx
    
    Location                Provider        Speed
    CDN                     Cachefly        30.5MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          1.71MB/s
    Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       1.65MB/s
    Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       1.34MB/s
    San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       1.27MB/s
    Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       2.28MB/s
    
    Tokyo, Japan            Linode          565KB/s
    Singapore               Softlayer       588KB/s
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         31.3MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        41.8MB/s
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 24.8 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 31.4 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 15.9 MB/s
    Average I/O     : 24.0333 MB/s
    
    -------------Speed test--------------------
    Testing North America locations
    Speedtest from Portland, Oregon, USA [ generously donated by http://bonevm.com ]                                                                         on a shared 100 Mbps port
            Download Speed: 1.22 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.17 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Seattle, Washington, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.c om ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.19 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.15 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Los Angeles, CA, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Los Angeles, California, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.27 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.18 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Denver, CO, USA on a shared 100 Mbps port
            Download Speed: .02 MB/sec
            Upload speed: .01 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Kansas City, MO, USA [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Dallas, TX, USA [ generously donated by http://cloudshards.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.55 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.58 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Chicago, IL, USA [ generously donated by http://vortexservers.com  ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.85 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 3.12 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada [ generously donated by http://mycustomhosting.net ] on a shared 1000 Mbps port in / 500 Mbps port out
            Download Speed: 1.99 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.32 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada [ generously donated by http://hostnun.net/ ] on a shared 500 Mbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from New York City, New York, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 2.36 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 4.10 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Atlanta, Georgia, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.90 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 3.14 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Lenoir, NC, USA [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ] on ashared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from  Asheville, NC, USA on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Jacksonville, FL, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 1.70 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 2.98 MB/sec
    
    Testing EU locations
    Speedtest from Paris, France on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 8.96 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 9.22 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Alblasserdam, Netherlands [ generously donated by http://ramnode,com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 20.23 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 26.93 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Dusseldorf, Germany [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ] o n a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Falkenstein, Germany [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 12.05 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 16.45 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Bucharest, Romania [ generously donated by http://www.prometeus.n  et ] on a semi-dedicated 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 2.60 MB/sec
            Upload speed: .67 MB/sec
    
    Testing Asian locations
    Speedtest from Singapore on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: .52 MB/sec
            Upload speed: .53 MB/sec
    Speedtest from Tokyo, Japan on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: .65 MB/sec
            Upload speed: .36 MB/sec
    
    Testing Australian locations
    Speedtest from Sydney, Australia on a shared 1 Gbps port
            Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
            Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    ---------------CPU test--------------------
    CPU: 1 x QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    Time taken to generate PI to 5000 decimal places with a single thread: 0m30.416s
    ----------------IO test-------------------
    Writing 1000MB file to disk
    (1.1 GB) copied, 20.9587 s, 51.2 MB/s
    
  • @sipe said:
    Hello all. I bought 5$ plan for backup data from online and kimsufi dedi for wipe and reinstall.

    Plan, Amsterdam NL
    $5 / month
    1x Intel E5 2.4GHz+ Core
    512MB RAM
    250GB HDD
    1TB Bandwidth

    Installed Ubuntu, SCPed all my files back and forth. Generally I'm ok with server, speeds are usually 10MB, sometimes fall back to 2-3MB, but not for long. Max speed 13MB.
    I didn't know about time4vps, next time I will go with them.

    Here are benchmarks.

    > System Info
    > -----------
    > Processor       : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    > CPU Cores       : 1
    > Frequency       : 2399.996 MHz
    > Memory          : 495 MB
    > Swap            : 511 MB
    > Uptime          : 6 days, 18:40,
    > 
    > OS              : Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
    > Arch            : i686 (32 Bit)
    > Kernel          : 3.2.0-23-generic-pae
    > Hostname        : hosthatch
    > 
    > 
    > Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    > ---------------------
    > Your public IPv4 is 176.126.xx.xx
    > 
    > Location                Provider        Speed
    > CDN                     Cachefly        30.5MB/s
    > 
    > Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          1.71MB/s
    > Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       1.65MB/s
    > Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       1.34MB/s
    > San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       1.27MB/s
    > Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       2.28MB/s
    > 
    > Tokyo, Japan            Linode          565KB/s
    > Singapore               Softlayer       588KB/s
    > 
    > Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         31.3MB/s
    > Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        41.8MB/s
    > 
    > 
    > Disk Speed
    > ----------
    > I/O (1st run)   : 24.8 MB/s
    > I/O (2nd run)   : 31.4 MB/s
    > I/O (3rd run)   : 15.9 MB/s
    > Average I/O     : 24.0333 MB/s
    > 
    > -------------Speed test--------------------
    > Testing North America locations
    > Speedtest from Portland, Oregon, USA [ generously donated by http://bonevm.com ]                                                                         on a shared 100 Mbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.22 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.17 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Seattle, Washington, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.c om ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.19 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.15 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Los Angeles, CA, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Los Angeles, California, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.27 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.18 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Denver, CO, USA on a shared 100 Mbps port
    >         Download Speed: .02 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: .01 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Kansas City, MO, USA [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Dallas, TX, USA [ generously donated by http://cloudshards.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.55 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.58 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Chicago, IL, USA [ generously donated by http://vortexservers.com  ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.85 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 3.12 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada [ generously donated by http://mycustomhosting.net ] on a shared 1000 Mbps port in / 500 Mbps port out
    >         Download Speed: 1.99 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.32 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada [ generously donated by http://hostnun.net/ ] on a shared 500 Mbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from New York City, New York, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 2.36 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 4.10 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Atlanta, Georgia, USA [ generously donated by http://ramnode.com] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.90 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 3.14 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Lenoir, NC, USA [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ] on ashared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from  Asheville, NC, USA on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Jacksonville, FL, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 1.70 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 2.98 MB/sec
    > 
    > Testing EU locations
    > Speedtest from Paris, France on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 8.96 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 9.22 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Alblasserdam, Netherlands [ generously donated by http://ramnode,com ] on on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 20.23 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 26.93 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Dusseldorf, Germany [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ] o n a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Falkenstein, Germany [ generously donated by http://megavz.com ]on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 12.05 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 16.45 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Bucharest, Romania [ generously donated by http://www.prometeus.n  et ] on a semi-dedicated 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 2.60 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: .67 MB/sec
    > 
    > Testing Asian locations
    > Speedtest from Singapore on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: .52 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: .53 MB/sec
    > Speedtest from Tokyo, Japan on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: .65 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: .36 MB/sec
    > 
    > Testing Australian locations
    > Speedtest from Sydney, Australia on a shared 1 Gbps port
    >         Download Speed: 0 MB/sec
    >         Upload speed: 0 MB/sec
    > ---------------CPU test--------------------
    > CPU: 1 x QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    > Time taken to generate PI to 5000 decimal places with a single thread: 0m30.416s
    > ----------------IO test-------------------
    > Writing 1000MB file to disk
    > (1.1 GB) copied, 20.9587 s, 51.2 MB/s
    > 

    did you just grave dogged a olllld thread?

    Thanked by 1sipe
  • @Caster said:
    did you just grave dogged a olllld thread?

    Yes, more recent review of HostHatch, where is the problem?

    Thanked by 1Anna_Parker
  • @sipe said:

    no problem but why not make a thread

  • Someone explain to me how 6/8 drives fail at the same time?
    Sounds pretty similar to my experience, data loss because of drive failure in NL.
    And then, after the node went online again, the drives failed again. That's when I moved along without looking back.

  • colingptcolingpt Member
    edited January 2016

    Ishaq said: Support: ★★★★★/5

    I opened about 3 tickets and they're all answered in a matter of hours, with helpful and to the point replies. They follow up which is also a plus.

    Really??? Maybe just for you... I did buy from them, their support only reply ticket at 6 pm EST for several mins, if you don't reply fast enough ,then what another 24 hours, after 3 days communication, I just quite. The good part is, they have no question to refund my money.

    I tried their HK 35 dollar / year plan, cpu was limited to 400 or 500mhz, and Unixbench is around 400.... The ip information is shown as in German, they said it is due to the delay o f applying ip information of international database.

    that's my knowledge about them.

    edit: should have not help to pump this old thread, sry guys... just notice the time ...

  • sipesipe Member
    edited January 2016

    I can't edit my post, so here it is.

    Serverbear benchmark
    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/01/17/ckpuZ2d1FlUG1n2U
    Result 1179.7

  • Are you serious?

    Set to sink.

  • darkdark Member

    i have a plan to make a test of a KVM node from HostHatch,get know the hosting almost 2 or 3 years..

  • darkdark Member

    this hosting customer service level is poor and sucks,when you paid and then post a service ticket,their customer service not reply you even in 3 days.But when you not paid yet,their customer service reply you very quick!

  • darkdark Member

    below is their KVM 768MB plan,its actual ram you can use is only 400MB,not same as declared:
    [root@vps ~]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 750 739 10 0 39 642
    -/+ buffers/cache: 58 692
    Swap: 127 0 127
    [root@vps ~]# cd /dev/shm
    [root@vps shm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=./memtest bs=1M count=100
    100+0 records in
    100+0 records out
    104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 0.166318 s, 630 MB/s
    [root@vps shm]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 750 741 9 0 39 620
    -/+ buffers/cache: 81 669
    Swap: 127 49 78
    [root@vps shm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=./memtest bs=1M count=200
    200+0 records in
    200+0 records out
    209715200 bytes (210 MB) copied, 0.149718 s, 1.4 GB/s
    [root@vps shm]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 750 741 9 0 39 627
    -/+ buffers/cache: 74 676
    Swap: 127 111 16
    [root@vps shm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=./memtest bs=1M count=300
    300+0 records in
    300+0 records out
    314572800 bytes (315 MB) copied, 0.234239 s, 1.3 GB/s
    [root@vps shm]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 750 742 8 0 39 639
    -/+ buffers/cache: 63 686
    Swap: 127 127 0
    [root@vps shm]# dd if=/dev/zero of=./memtest bs=1M count=400
    dd: writing `./memtest': No space left on device
    376+0 records in
    375+0 records out
    393486336 bytes (393 MB) copied, 0.264228 s, 1.5 GB/s

  • darkdark Member

    if you request a cancel and refund,their customer service will not reply you anymore...this hosting really sucks...stay away from them....

This discussion has been closed.