Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

GarnetNetworks - Amethyst 1GB KVM VPS review (Limited time offer: $2.02 first/MO then $5.05/MO)

TorTor Member
edited September 2013 in Reviews

Hello! My name is Tor and I come from Norway, recently got my hands on a GarnetNetworks Amethyst VPS. This is my first review so please don’t judge me too hard, I have been looking at others so I know a little bit of what I’m doing.

Specs:

Disk: 50 GB MegaRAID10
Cores: 2x (Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1270 v3 (8M Cache, 3.50 GHz)
Memory: 1 GB – 1024 MB
IPs: 1x IPv4 (1 IP is plenty, suggest tunnelbroker.net for IPv6)
Bandwidth: 512 GB (they provide more if you send them an email proving you use the bandwidth legitimately)
Speed: 1 Gbps (Only if you have the Virto network card properly setup)
Virtualization: KVM, don’t know if you can oversell this but I don’t think so.
OS: Windows & Linux since its KVM, it allows you to bring your own Windows license if you are interested in this.
Panel: The normal and most used SolusVM running nodes as “Slaves”.
Location/datacenter: It’s hosted by ColoCrossing on their Buffalo, NY datacentre.

These tests are all done on Debian 7 which I reinstalled just before I did this test.

Now, let’s begin shall we:
(I'll copy the text from SSH to make it easier for you but still have pictures.)

Since I’m a member of FreeVPS and this bench is very popular, let’s run their benchmark:
(Please keep in mind peak hour and my node Slave4, these might be inaccurate)

 root@smnk:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
 CPU model :  QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
 Number of cores : 2
 CPU frequency :  3400.016 MHz
 Total amount of ram : 1009 MB
 Total amount of swap : 0 MB
 System uptime :   2 min,
 Download speed from CacheFly: 14.9MB/s
 Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 12.9MB/s
 Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 4.77MB/s
 Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.97MB/s
 Download speed from i3d.net, NL: 3.65MB/s
 Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 3.40MB/s
 Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.22MB/s
 Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 3.81MB/s
 Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 4.19MB/s
 Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 21.0MB/s
 I/O speed :  235 MB/s

Since speedtest.net is popular I did a test on that too (It’s also not guaranteed because it’s designed for home lines not servers):

Here is the CPU info, it says QUEMU instead of Intel Xeon-* but that’s because of KVM:

 root@smnk:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
 processor       : 0
 vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
 cpu family      : 6
 model           : 13
 model name      : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
 stepping        : 3
 microcode       : 0x1
 cpu MHz         : 3400.016
 cache size      : 4096 KB
 fdiv_bug        : no
 hlt_bug         : no
 f00f_bug        : no
 coma_bug        : no
 fpu             : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level     : 4
 wp              : yes
 flags           : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm abm
 bogomips        : 6800.03
 clflush size    : 64
 cache_alignment : 64
 address sizes   : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
 power management:

 processor       : 1
 vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
 cpu family      : 6
 model           : 13
 model name      : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
 stepping        : 3
 microcode       : 0x1
 cpu MHz         : 3400.016
 cache size      : 4096 KB
 fdiv_bug        : no
 hlt_bug         : no
 f00f_bug        : no
 coma_bug        : no
 fpu             : yes
 fpu_exception   : yes
 cpuid level     : 4
 wp              : yes
 flags           : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm abm
 bogomips        : 6800.03
 clflush size    : 64
 cache_alignment : 64
 address sizes   : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
 power management:

I/O test (to confirm the FreeVPS bench results):

 root@smnk:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
 16384+0 records in
 16384+0 records out
 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.56933 s, 235 MB/s

Here is the speedtest.net results:

 root@smnk:~# python speedtest-cli.py --share
 Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
 Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
 Testing from ColoCrossing (***.*.**.***)...
 Selecting best server based on ping...
 Hosted by FrostGaming (Buffalo, NY) [16.56 km]: 9.219 ms
 Testing download speed........................................
 Download: 737.71 Mbit/s
 Testing upload speed..................................................
 Upload: 261.96 Mbit/s
 Share results: http://www.speedtest.net/result/3000044714.png

If anybody is interested I can add UnixBench 5.1.3 later.

GarnetNetworks is not so known on the VPS market (It recently started). It offers quite good resources for such a low price, if you want to try it to see its power I recommend you to use their limited time “$2.02 USD” offer. Link: http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/13500/garnet-networks-budget-promo-sale-lifetime-first-month-discount/p1

I'd personally give this VPS 7-8/10
Amazing value for such price, but I can't quite get the CacheFly and those speeds to match the results from speedtest.net. It's most likely normal since the server I tested to was the same network and not the others (or bits-bytes?).

Comments

  • I also have a VPS from them, this case Diamond package (4 cores, 4 GB RAM, 100 GB space, 2 TB bandwidth). I am currrently using Windows server 2008 r2 iwth zPanel and RDP, and what I can say, I never manage to use more than 2 GB RAM (even with peak usage).

    Everything "just works", and with the Virtio card I use to get over 1100 MBPS in single speed tests. I have posted a few reviews online, both on Free VPS and Subnetweb, and as far as I can say I like how things are run over at Garnet.

    Did I say the connection sometimes burst to 10 Gbit/s?

  • TorTor Member
    edited September 2013

    @luis12345620 said:
    I also have a VPS from them, this case Diamond package (4 cores, 4 GB RAM, 100 GB space, 2 TB bandwidth). I am currrently using Windows server 2008 r2 iwth zPanel and RDP, and what I can say, I never manage to use more than 2 GB RAM (even with peak usage).

    Everything "just works", and with the Virtio card I use to get over 1100 MBPS in single speed tests. I have posted a few reviews online, both on Free VPS and Subnetweb, and as far as I can say I like how things are run over at Garnet.

    Did I say the connection sometimes burst to 10 Gbit/s?

    About that burst up to 10 Gbit/s, I'm not sure when you get that as I haven’t seen it (Haven’t been checking - you know, who needs constant bandwidth usage these days? except those who run download servers) but I assume non-peak time when it's not used.

  • @Tor said:
    About that burst up to 10 Gbit/s, I'm not sure when you get that as I haven’t seen it (Haven’t been checking - you know, who needs constant bandwidth usage these days? except those who run download servers) but I assume non-peak time when it's not used.

    You can use the Virtio card to get those speeds, and yes it's mostly at 3AM when I get those speeds.

  • 10Gbit/s?

    LOL

    Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

  • @luis12345620 said:
    You can use the Virtio card to get those speeds, and yes it's mostly at 3AM when I get those speeds.

    Virtio driver shows as 10Gbps on Windows. It's not 10Gbps. You cannot get 1100Mbps on a 1Gbps connection.

  • I used to get then on a single speedtest, but it must have been in local network. That was just a speedtest.net result.

  • The 10Gbps burst is only used if the entire node is under heavy network load. A single user will never actually use the "10 Gbps burst" speed.

  • TorTor Member
    edited September 2013

    @KyleGN said:
    The 10Gbps burst is only used if the entire node is under heavy network load. A single user will never actually use the "10 Gbps burst" speed.

    Of course, a VPS of this pricing would never reach more than 1 GB/s.

    Makes total sense, I myself do with a 100 Mb/s (+) connection which it is capable of.

Sign In or Register to comment.