Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › How can file hosting sites provides 50TB/uploader storage? Do they cheating? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

How can file hosting sites provides 50TB/uploader storage? Do they cheating?

2»

Comments

  • jetchiragjetchirag Member

    @vovler said:
    If you are looking for a genuine big storage solution, take a look at Incero's 192TBs:

    Thats about $2.5 per TB, and if you get to be VIP, it gets to about $2

    Sorry OP, you lost this right since the day you joined LET

    Thanked by 2angstrom jvnadr
  • vovlervovler Member

    @jetchirag said:

    @vovler said:
    If you are looking for a genuine big storage solution, take a look at Incero's 192TBs:

    Thats about $2.5 per TB, and if you get to be VIP, it gets to about $2

    Sorry OP, you lost this right since the day you joined LET

    Yeah, I posted this one day before the incero/speedykvm shit happened.

    Thanked by 1netomx
  • vovlervovler Member
    edited February 2018

    Double post.

  • williewillie Member

    pahapoika said: How? Well I'm running seafile.com professional server with OVH object storage as data backend.

    What about OVH bandwidth charges? Also that is zero margin over what OVH charges for storage, unless you mean their cloud archive product which has its own drawbacks.

  • pahapoikapahapoika Member

    @willie said:

    pahapoika said: How? Well I'm running seafile.com professional server with OVH object storage as data backend.

    What about OVH bandwidth charges? Also that is zero margin over what OVH charges for storage, unless you mean their cloud archive product which has its own drawbacks.

    Well yeah, outgoing gb costs 0,01e and I meant the object storage, the archive wouldn't make sense since it's cold storage.

  • pahapoikapahapoika Member

    If anyone actually want's I can start selling it for the 0.01e/gb/month price since I have 5 users free from my 9 users license

  • huntercophuntercop Member

    Unless it's porn, you won't use most of it.

  • First-RootFirst-Root Member, Host Rep

    The internet is purely for porn so we are good to go.

  • AidanAidan Member
    edited February 2018

    pahapoika said: If anyone actually want's I can start selling it for the 0.01e/gb/month price since I have 5 users free from my 9 users license

    $12.25/TB/mo isn't all that special.

    pahapoika said: outgoing gb costs 0,01e

    Again, $3600 per gbit commit isn't a good/special price.

  • pahapoikapahapoika Member
    edited February 2018

    @Aidan said:
    $12.25/TB/mo isn't all that special.

    Well 10e/TB/month is same as what Google askes, except you wouldn't need to fear about DMCA or NSA.

    Again, $3600 per gbit commit isn't a good/special price.

    $3600per gbit???

Sign In or Register to comment.