Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Cloudflare Warp lets you serve websites from behind a NAT'd server
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Cloudflare Warp lets you serve websites from behind a NAT'd server

DeftNerdDeftNerd Member
edited November 2017 in General

Cloudflare Warp is in Beta. It allows you to run a system service that basically opens up a VPN tunnel, through a NAT firewall, to the inside of Cloudflare.

This means that your cheap NAT VPS is now much more useful. You can actually serve websites from it!

Here is a Cloudflare blog post that explains a bit more.

Thanked by 1Hybrid

Comments

  • If that stays free that could be useful!

  • man if they can learn how to port forward eventually they'll learn how to handle memory management!

  • @WSS said:
    man if they can learn how to port forward eventually they'll learn how to handle memory management!

    With or without lava lamps?

  • LAMP stacks are for wussies and communists.

    Thanked by 1kalimov622
  • I was using Warp Beta with one of my domains with a NAT VPS. It works well, but I'm afraid once it exits Beta, you will be forced to enter Argo, which I'm not a huge fan of just due to the cost. If they could integrated it with the free platform, it'd be a huuge hit and make Cloudflare even better.

  • @daxterfellowes said:
    I was using Warp Beta with one of my domains with a NAT VPS. It works well, but I'm afraid once it exits Beta, you will be forced to enter Argo, which I'm not a huge fan of just due to the cost. If they could integrated it with the free platform, it'd be a huuge hit and make Cloudflare even better.

    I saw a comment on their blog that suggests it will be free for subdomains of your domain after beta.

  • I thought there was already a way to cloudflare NAT servers. Look at Lowendspirit forums for more info. I never tried it myself and an more likely to use BunnyCDN than Cloudflare if I need a CDN for some reason.

  • HarambeHarambe Member, Host Rep

    @willie said:
    I thought there was already a way to cloudflare NAT servers. Look at Lowendspirit forums for more info. I never tried it myself and an more likely to use BunnyCDN than Cloudflare if I need a CDN for some reason.

    You just use the IPv6 address and it'll do 4-to-6 proxy, but that's still on port 80

    Thanked by 1rm_
  • I don't know what Argo is, but I believe a VPS with dedicated ipv4 is cheaper?

  • @dahartigan said:

    @daxterfellowes said:
    I was using Warp Beta with one of my domains with a NAT VPS. It works well, but I'm afraid once it exits Beta, you will be forced to enter Argo, which I'm not a huge fan of just due to the cost. If they could integrated it with the free platform, it'd be a huuge hit and make Cloudflare even better.

    I saw a comment on their blog that suggests it will be free for subdomains of your domain after beta.

    Oh good! I'll need to read that new blog post since the one I had read was when the originally made the announcement. In the docs, it seemed like they had originally intended it to be used with Argo. I'm glad they'd making the decision not to be completely on Argo.

    Free with sub-domains is completely OK for me and honestly I'd only be using it for sub-service and not for www records so thumbs up by me! I'll have to start getting this integrated into some Docker containers to see how that and the access platform is.

  • jetchiragjetchirag Member
    edited November 2017

    @psycholyzern said:
    I don't know what Argo is, but I believe a VPS with dedicated ipv4 is cheaper?

    IPv4 costs providers. You can escape that cost by sharing IP!

  • mikhomikho Member, Host Rep

    How about; login to the client area and set your domain forwarding on both http and https???

    No need for a vpn tunnel kinda thingy-wingy.

  • @mikho said:
    How about; login to the client area and set your domain forwarding on both http and https???

    No need for a vpn tunnel kinda thingy-wingy.

    How would you do that on a NAT VPS where there is only a shared IPv4 but available IPv6 that can be used. Cloudflare will translate IPv6 to IPv4 for you. Some visitors do not have IPv6 capabilities and have to use IPv4, so this bridges the gap between them. Specially with the Warp beta, there is no longer a need to run additional services for reverse proxy when you can do it via Warp.

  • The host node reads the URL and forwards it to your internal IP.

  • mikhomikho Member, Host Rep

    @daxterfellowes said:

    @mikho said:
    How about; login to the client area and set your domain forwarding on both http and https???

    No need for a vpn tunnel kinda thingy-wingy.

    How would you do that on a NAT VPS where there is only a shared IPv4 but available IPv6 that can be used. Cloudflare will translate IPv6 to IPv4 for you. Some visitors do not have IPv6 capabilities and have to use IPv4, so this bridges the gap between them. Specially with the Warp beta, there is no longer a need to run additional services for reverse proxy when you can do it via Warp.

    We (lowendspirit) use a proxy on the host your on which forward the traffic to your vps.
    Think of it like shared hosting but your are using your own container which you can do almost anything with.

    Want to change the iptables rules? No worries, log in to your vps and update it.

    I must say that not all lowendspirit providers offers https forwarding (no need to send your cert or anything).

    If you were a customer of mine you would:

    • setup the domain in the client area i.e forward http(s) to the vps of choice.
    • point an A record to the external IP that you were assigned.
    • Create and config the cert to use on your vps.

    Done!

  • @mikho said:

    We (lowendspirit) use a proxy on the host your on which forward the traffic to your vps.
    Think of it like shared hosting but your are using your own container which you can do almost anything with. (cont.)

    Fair point. I suppose it was reliance on the provider to manage/direct traffic which was the deterrent for me. I admit that I had not delved into the specifics with LES in regards to the proxy that was provided with it, so that is my error in execution.

    Thanked by 1webcraft
Sign In or Register to comment.