Need your opinion on the performance of my VPS (time4vps)

Webinium

I would like your on my VPS at time4vps.

I did not pay much, but before the performances were better.

What do you think ?

Do I have to open a ticket or is it normal?

System Info

---

Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 v3 @ 1.90GHz

CPU Cores : 1

Frequency : 1897.805 MHz

Memory : 512 MB

Swap : 256 MB

Uptime : 2 days, 2 min,

OS : CentOS release 6.9 (Final)

Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)

Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab123.9

Speedtest (IPv4 only)

---

Location Provider Speed

CDN Cachefly 11.4MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 1.47MB/s

Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 4.49MB/s

Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 4.71MB/s

San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.75MB/s

Washington, DC, US Softlayer 1.99MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.99MB/s

Singapore Softlayer 3.23MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 11.2MB/s

Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb

Disk Speed

I/O (1st run) : 39.8 MB/s

I/O (2nd run) : 59.6 MB/s

I/O (3rd run) : 52.7 MB/s

Average I/O : 50.7 MB/s

Tion

From my experience this is the normal performance of their network.

jar

Seems pretty good for backing up things in NL, and decent enough to most of the softlayer spots, if you're not moving a ton of data.

Webinium

@jarland said:
Seems pretty good for backing up things in NL, and decent enough to most of the softlayer spots, if you're not moving a ton of data.

thank you for your reply

jvnadr

if this is a storage vps line, then, it's more than fine. Disk IO is fast enough to hold the back up operations without any issue and speeds are also fine for most of Europe (try some more with speedtest.net script to other locations/providers in EU) .
Just don't expect to have gigabyte speeds and ssd io's with ~3€ per month for 1TB space.

sapidadarman

i think is normal. i'm using time4vps storage, and my upload speed from Indonesia is around 1MB/s.

time4vps

From server specifications it appears to be our old 0.5 TB package which comes with 100 Mbps port speed so 11.2 MB/s on 100 mbps port speed looks decent

K4Y5

@Webinium said:
I would like your on my VPS at time4vps.

I did not pay much, but before the performances were better.

What do you think ?

Do I have to open a ticket or is it normal?

System Info

---

Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 v3 @ 1.90GHz

CPU Cores : 1

Frequency : 1897.805 MHz

Memory : 512 MB

Swap : 256 MB

Uptime : 2 days, 2 min,

OS : CentOS release 6.9 (Final)

Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)

Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab123.9

Speedtest (IPv4 only)

---

Location Provider Speed

CDN Cachefly 11.4MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 1.47MB/s

Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 4.49MB/s

Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 4.71MB/s

San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.75MB/s

Washington, DC, US Softlayer 1.99MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.99MB/s

Singapore Softlayer 3.23MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 11.2MB/s

Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb

Disk Speed

I/O (1st run) : 39.8 MB/s

I/O (2nd run) : 59.6 MB/s

I/O (3rd run) : 52.7 MB/s

Average I/O : 50.7 MB/s

That speed is alright for a VPS meant for taking back-ups.

I had issues with the performance when I first bought one, but I have learned to live with it. You can always expect the same I/O and network throughput at any time of the day while expecting your data and the company holding it to stick around when you actually need to pull a restore job, which is more than you can say for quite a few providers out there.

For the amount of money they charge, the service sure is rock solid.

hostmyguild

I think this is fine for "general" use. I haven't dealt with time4vps but just looking at
the stats it's kind of average. Definitely not bad.

Nekki

@hostmyguild said:
I think this is fine for "general" use. I haven't dealt with time4vps but just looking at
the stats it's kind of average. Definitely not bad.

Average performance for a below average price?