Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


How does a Xeon 4114 stack up compared to E5 2630 v4?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

How does a Xeon 4114 stack up compared to E5 2630 v4?

YmpkerYmpker Member
edited August 2017 in General

Any ideas?

http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/35/Intel_Xeon_4114_vs_Intel_Xeon_E5-2630_v4.html

Did not give away much other than that 4114 is more expensive for just about the same performance.

Comments

  • WSSWSS Member

    Looks pretty much like a wash to me- with the L2/L3 cache being the only real noticable difference.

  • WilliamWilliam Member
    edited August 2017

    Do keep in mind that benchmarks for new CPUs have always a low amount of data which can skew this. Unless N = 250 or more this is not too useful data.

    Ympker said: Did not give away much other than that 4114 is more expensive for just about the same performance.

    Same TDP, same core amount, the E5 is a bit higher default clock though.

    4114 has less RAM support but more PCIe lanes (+8), it also does AVX-512 (1 CU) which the E5 does not at all.

    If you use AVX-512 OR sometimes only few cores you go better with the 4114 - similar to AMD's XFR it can do "Speed shift" which raises clocks on 1-4 cores usage higher than the turbo (or same, but faster switched). If you do AVX (non 512) you likely also end up better with the 4114 as it can hold the full AVX load permanently (AVX is VERY processing heavy and easily crosses the TDP).

    Ultimately thus, unless you need AVX/AVX512 or single thread speed: get the cheaper one.

    Thanked by 1Ympker
Sign In or Register to comment.