Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Anyone with Time4VPS/Hostens VPS? Can you share a speed bench?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Anyone with Time4VPS/Hostens VPS? Can you share a speed bench?

nqservicesnqservices Member
in General

Hi all,

I have used them in the past when all plans had 400Mbps / Network Speed. But now I see that their smaller plans only have 100Mbps.

Anyone using Time4VPS/Hostens Small VPS plans with 100Mbps network port? If you have the time and don't mind, please share the bellow speed benchmark so I can see how their network performs:

wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash

Also from who is using them, any experience with their KVM plans?

Thanks

Comments

  • nielsniels Member

    Benchmark for their smallest KVM plan (which also has 100Mbps network):

    Benchmark started on Tue Aug  8 07:06:29 UTC 2017

System Info
-----------
Processor       : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPU Cores       : 1
Frequency       : 2397.222 MHz
Memory          : 2010 MB
Swap            : 0 MB


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------

Location                Provider        Speed
CDN                     Cachefly        11.3MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          1.73MB/s
Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       10.0MB/s
Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       9.89MB/s
San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       9.71MB/s
Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       10.2MB/s

Tokyo, Japan            Linode          7.11MB/s
Singapore               Softlayer       6.76MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         11.1MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        11.2MB/s


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 51.1 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 52.3 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 52.3 MB/s
Average I/O     : 51.9 MB/s

    Unless you really need KVM, I'd suggest going for one of their OpenVZ plans.

  • vimalwarevimalware Member

    kinda disappointed to see the KVM throttled to 100mbit

  • kkonekokkoneko Member
    edited August 2017

    @vimalware said:
    kinda disappointed to see the KVM throttled to 100mbit

    Time4vps port speed generally increase if you use higher plan. the lowest one is 100mbps, next plan goes to 200, so on and so forth. iirc, the max speed is 400mbps

  • hostenshostens Member, Host Rep

    KVM Medium

    Benchmark started on Tue Aug  8 11:15:47 EEST 2017

System Info
-----------
Processor   : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPU Cores   : 2
Frequency   : 2397.222 MHz
Memory      : 3790 MB
Swap        :  MB


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------

Location        Provider    Speed
CDN         Cachefly    22.4MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      9.12MB/s 
Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   7.72MB/s 
Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   6.76MB/s 
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   6.84MB/s 
Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   10.3MB/s 

Tokyo, Japan        Linode      4.59MB/s 
Singapore       Softlayer   3.12MB/s 

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     18.6MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    20.9MB/s 


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 50.2 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 51.8 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 51.8 MB/s
Average I/O : 51.2667 MB/s

    KVM Large

    Benchmark started on Tue Aug  8 11:18:03 EEST 2017

System Info
-----------
Processor   : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPU Cores   : 4
Frequency   : 2397.222 MHz
Memory      : 7822 MB
Swap        :  MB


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------

Location        Provider    Speed
CDN         Cachefly    43.5MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      9.10MB/s 
Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   7.90MB/s 
Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   7.01MB/s 
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   6.72MB/s 
Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   10.2MB/s 

Tokyo, Japan        Linode      4.65MB/s 
Singapore       Softlayer   3.25MB/s 

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     31.3MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    41.8MB/s 


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 49.4 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 49.6 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 49.7 MB/s
Average I/O : 49.5667 MB/s
    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • manlivomanlivo Member
    edited August 2017

    My Storage VPS Benchmark

    Sorry, i don't have KVM with them.

  • nqservicesnqservices Member
    edited August 2017

    Thanks all for the benchmarks!

    From what I see Large plans with more than 100Mbps only have advantage for European traffic, since to USA neither plans will get more than ~10 MB/s

    @time4vps the disk speed of the Medium is equal to the Large plan, both limited to 50MB/s?

  • FoxelVoxFoxelVox Member

    hey @hostens do you have a benchmark for the 1$ ovz plan?

  • nocheersnocheers Member
    edited August 2017

    @FoxelVox

    [root@Guest ~]# wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2397.101 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 15.0 GB (0.7 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 768 MB (172 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 384 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 19 min
Load average         : 0.03, 0.02, 0.00
OS                   : CentOS 6.9
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab123.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 62.2 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 53.3 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 53.5 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 56.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         33.2MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          4.26MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            2.40MB/s
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           25.1MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           16.2MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             1.23MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           6.26MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          7.28MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            36.3MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           3.63MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          4.34MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           7.05MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           7.17MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           10.8MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           7.30MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           4.47MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    5.33MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA       2607:f0d0:3001:78::2    15.1MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     29.4MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     2.46MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    4.53MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This is a bench test I run on my ovz 11.88EUR annually VPS.

    Pretty solid VPS, good provider.

    But frankly speaking, KVM plan is not very cheap.

    Thanked by 1hostens
Sign In or Register to comment.