Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


UK VPS - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

UK VPS

2»

Comments

  • edited July 2017

    @matthewkilpatrick said:
    It's faster by miles than the fibre / cable broadband that I can get in my local area!

    How do you measure bandwidth speed by miles? I've never heard that speed metric before.

    Thanked by 1godziila
  • @IAlwaysBeCoding said:

    @matthewkilpatrick said:
    It's faster by miles than the fibre / cable broadband that I can get in my local area!

    How do you measure bandwidth speed by miles? I've never heard that speed metric before.

    Not literally measured by miles - although, if that download speed is almost the same in upload speed, it's at least 75x faster than the quickest upload I get on Virgin's cable network in my area (12Mbps). Just more of an expression to reflect how much quicker it is than what I'm able to get on what @godziila is describing as 'ADSL' performance.

    Thanked by 1godziila
  • @matthewkilpatrick said:

    @IAlwaysBeCoding said:

    @matthewkilpatrick said:
    It's faster by miles than the fibre / cable broadband that I can get in my local area!

    How do you measure bandwidth speed by miles? I've never heard that speed metric before.

    Not literally measured by miles - although, if that download speed is almost the same in upload speed, it's at least 75x faster than the quickest upload I get on Virgin's cable network in my area (12Mbps). Just more of an expression to reflect how much quicker it is than what I'm able to get on what @godziila is describing as 'ADSL' performance.

    But everybody knows @godzilla will be gone for trolling a known provider here. He doesn't believe it is actually 'ADSL' speed. He is just playing stupid.

    Thanked by 1godziila
  • DeanDean Member

    Ooooh, next time i'm down south i'll take a tour @clouvider :-)

    Thanked by 2Clouvider godziila
  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider

    @Dean said:
    Ooooh, next time i'm down south i'll take a tour @clouvider :-)

    Looking forward to it :).

    Thanked by 1godziila
  • I> @matthewkilpatrick said:

    @godziila said:
    No tour am not interested to tour your home basement data center with adsl uplinks.

    Here's a speed test I got over their network earlier today (from a provider using their servers):

    [matthew@ldn1-uk ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    --2017-07-18 15:28:41-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'

    100%[===========================================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 112M/s in 0.9s

    2017-07-18 15:28:42 (112 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

    Almost 900Mbps there over Clouvider's 'ADSL' network - @Clouvider mind telling me where you're sourcing this 'ADSL' connection? It's faster by miles than the fibre / cable broadband that I can get in my local area!

    That's a fake speed test,

    I just did one of my Clouvider vps

    mark@uk:~$ wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    --2017-07-18 21:11:35--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
    
     0% [                                       ] 999,424     25.0KB/s  eta 67m 37s^C
    
    
  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 2017

    Next time when you try to fake a post like that I propose you calculate the ETA better as you botched it by 2 minutes and 17 seconds. =)

    #mathrulez

  • @Clouvider said:
    Next time when you try to fake a post like that I propose you calculate the ETA better as you botched it by 2 minutes and 17 seconds. =)

    #mathrulez

    Must be a wget error, i can share the Clouvider server ip i tested from if that helps.

  • @Clouvider said:
    @godziila that'd be as much as we're happy to share publicly. We're as transparent as we can be. If you (or anyone for that matter) is interested in our services, we're happy to meet at any of our PoP sites and take you on a tour.

    If you're interested, you can read more about our recent upgrades here: https://www.clouvider.co.uk/blog/infrastructure-upgrades-newsletter/

    Thanks for sharing these information, makes a better point for possible future service consideration.
    But kinda wondering, why you don't have a peeringdb-entry? Mean, yeah sure HE's information are nice as well, but am always looking for peering speeds of providers, because you know, sometimes they have like a super-duper IX, but are only connected thorugh 100M to it.
    Now knowing that you peer with LINX at at least 10gbps which is nice of course, but would be even nicer to show what the network can do in a little entry there instead of searching. :)

  • ClouviderClouvider Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 2017

    bluesega said: why you don't have a peeringdb-entry?

    We do !

    http://as62240.peeringdb.com

    We don't like congestion, so worry not, when the traffic levels justify it, we will upgrade port with any IX/peer/transit we have. Quality and Customer Satisfaction are the most important to us.

  • @Clouvider said:

    bluesega said: why you don't have a peeringdb-entry?

    We do !

    http://as62240.peeringdb.com

    We don't like congestion, so worry not, when the traffic levels justify it, we will upgrade port with any IX/peer/transit we have. Quality and Customer Satisfaction are the most important to us.

    Wow, gotta contact the doctor about my eyes... Am sure I've not come across this while searching.......but now it does......okay, thanks XD

    Thanked by 1Clouvider
  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited July 2017

    I used AboveClouds.co.uk in the past. @jacob

Sign In or Register to comment.