Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Any KVM VPS company in Choopa's NJ Datacenter?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Any KVM VPS company in Choopa's NJ Datacenter?

Except these: Armorshark, GetKVM, SSDVirt

Comments

  • bobbybobby Member

    Armorshark is discontinuing kvm there.

    Are you planning adding choopa too? :)

  • @bobby said:
    Armorshark is discontinuing kvm there.

    Are you planning adding choopa too? :)

    No, I'm looking to host a website on a KVM VPS. All I found was these 3 and I'm not convinced to go with one of them.

    Constant itself does VPS but they are giving single E5506 CPU for their VPS which is slower than my grandma.

  • johnjohn Member

    What's wrong with us :(?

  • @john said:
    What's wrong with us :(?

    Overused hosting template :(

    Thanked by 1zfedora
  • SpiritSpirit Member
    edited June 2013

    No.. not KVM (Fliphost have decent OpenVZ storage boxes here, tho) however if you would be happy with XenPV in Choopa's NJ Datacenter you can try http://www.greenyhosting.com/ - really decent and stable stuff.
    Check WHT for their special deals here and there.

  • johnjohn Member
    edited June 2013

    @serverian said:
    Overused hosting template :(

    I'm working on a new website.

  • bobbybobby Member

    @serverian said:

    No, I'm looking to host a website on a KVM VPS. All I found was these 3 and I'm not convinced to go with one of them.
    Constant itself does VPS but they are giving single E5506 CPU for their VPS which is slower than my grandma.

    I agree. Fliphost should add KVM in Choopa-

  • SupremeBytes/@DamienSB isn't in Choopa, but it is in NJ with Interserver.

    Zap5/@Eased is in Choopa with VMWare.

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    @bobby In the works

  • Not sure about about virtualization..

    http://www.constant.com/cloud/vps/

  • @EarthVPN said:
    Not sure about about virtualization..

    http://www.constant.com/cloud/vps/

    virtualization is Xen, cloud platform is OpenStack, Cloudian for object storage

  • @DomainBop Thanks for clarification.

  • For anyone interested, I've went with SolarVPS with their Xen HVM. Their network looks like have better pings to the USA and Europe than Choopa.

  • bdtechbdtech Member

    Which provider is best in NJ?

  • serverianserverian Member
    edited June 2013

    @bdtech said:
    Which provider is best in NJ?

    If OVZ + LEB -> Fliphost

  • NatcoWeb does KVM in Choopa

    They didn't lose power during Superstorm Sandy. May not be a "LEB budget" but sometimes spending a little bit more gets you better quality such as a provider who didn't lose power during a storm that found DCs with broke generators, no disaster plans and flooded basements

  • SpiritSpirit Member

    @serverian said:
    For anyone interested, I've went with SolarVPS with their Xen HVM. Their network looks like have better pings to the USA and Europe than Choopa.

    Clifon, NJ? To Europe? Comparable. Better? Not! :)

  • I got 77 ms from their location to Nerherlands. I got 83 ms from Choopa to Netherlands.

  • SpiritSpirit Member
    edited June 2013

    Check it from more locations ;-)

    65.181.127.85 Clifton, NJ
    108.61.84.162 Choopa, NJ

    It's just little difference (3 - 6ms) in my tests always in favour of choopa (tested from UK, Germany, Austria... and NL)

  • Nope, I've tested to all my locations, every time solarvps won by 5-6 ms

  • SpiritSpirit Member
    edited June 2013

    I just checked again from another 6 locations from europe. Choopa ALWAYS won. We should start to include mtr results :P

  • Some mixed results..

    Amsterdam

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    38 packets transmitted, 38 received, 0% packet loss, time 37173ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.874/80.396/87.299/1.287 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    41 packets transmitted, 41 received, 0% packet loss, time 40998ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.996/83.289/86.990/0.716 ms

    Amsterdam2

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    36 packets transmitted, 36 received, 0% packet loss, time 35767ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 74.551/83.787/119.878/8.578 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    42 packets transmitted, 42 received, 0% packet loss, time 41730ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 78.430/87.907/117.402/9.553 ms

    Hampshire

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    35 packets transmitted, 35 received, 0% packet loss, time 34558ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.170/72.281/72.735/0.248 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    43 packets transmitted, 43 received, 0% packet loss, time 42657ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 74.863/75.091/75.619/0.269 ms

    Maidenhead

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    35 packets transmitted, 35 received, 0% packet loss, time 34434ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.919/69.293/70.435/0.424 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    44 packets transmitted, 43 received, 2% packet loss, time 43089ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 71.897/72.476/74.503/0.633 ms

    Manchester

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29538ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 76.533/85.240/109.972/7.301 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    47 packets transmitted, 47 received, 0% packet loss, time 47025ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 153.168/177.738/189.315/6.458 ms

    --- 64.237.34.2 ping statistics ---
    12 packets transmitted, 12 received, 0% packet loss, time 11698ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 76.768/77.711/81.104/1.368 ms

    London

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    31 packets transmitted, 31 received, 0% packet loss, time 30941ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.864/70.084/71.432/0.430 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    43 packets transmitted, 43 received, 0% packet loss, time 42778ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 71.827/72.003/72.523/0.406 ms

    Ireland

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    29 packets transmitted, 29 received, 0% packet loss, time 28219ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.385/84.611/85.139/0.364 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    49 packets transmitted, 49 received, 0% packet loss, time 48221ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.589/84.837/85.177/0.383 ms

    Frankfurt

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    27 packets transmitted, 27 received, 0% packet loss, time 26838ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.876/83.592/85.201/0.628 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49605ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 88.430/89.032/90.163/0.392 ms

    Romania

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    28 packets transmitted, 27 received, 3% packet loss, time 27838ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 119.371/137.163/585.517/87.936 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    35 packets transmitted, 35 received, 0% packet loss, time 34920ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 114.779/116.486/120.474/1.925 ms

    Milan

    --- 65.181.127.85 ping statistics ---
    27 packets transmitted, 27 received, 0% packet loss, time 26495ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 92.916/93.042/93.908/0.198 ms

    --- 108.61.84.162 ping statistics ---
    51 packets transmitted, 51 received, 0% packet loss, time 50272ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 92.886/93.077/98.414/0.844 ms

Sign In or Register to comment.