New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Don't say fake if you never touched dem boobs. These boobs have better reviews than SolusVM 1.20 for what it's worth. Boobs you can't keep your eyes off of.
All 3 pair?
This, the staff just hide and do nothing about it until it becomes public and embarrassing.
Maybe a public bug tracker thread on LET/WHT?
Thanks - we have some work scheduled for IP addresses, so it makes sense to add this onto it.
IP bandwidth usage I'll have checked out.
Indeed. Given their share of the market with SolusVM-1, if they produced a decent SolusVM-2, they would very likely have a cash cow for years to come ...
I spoke to Phill about this about 3 years ago, and again about 1 year ago, I put in a ticket regarding it more than once.
The bandwidth measuring has never accurately worked, like at all, just don't bother putting work in to fixing it, you cant, other things that you can fix are more important.
Does CC have any storage space for that?
Haha, thanks made my day.
Little off topic but what are peoples current opinions of LXC vs OpenVZ 7?
I had a look at Virtualizor and their implementation of LXC. It uses privileged containers as far as I can tell. I don't think that is something anyone would want to publicly host with. I don't think unprivileged containers are considered secure enough either. At least not yet.
So OVZ 7 still looks like the better alternative to me...once it becomes more stable.
exactly the same here
Time for another cluster!
Francisco
LXC is fine for hosting - but nobody wants to be first to implement it because of the perception that it's risky.
(There actually was an LXC offer on LEB from an obscure host but in general nobody wants to be the first big name to bet on it.)
Siteground runs LXC in their VPS.
There's a number of hosts running LXD/LXC in production nowadays like Kinsta and Siteground and you can find some on here too like Vapornode.
Set it up on one of the NAT storage plans. Make sure you get a LVM based one so it can be resized easily.
At least there have been some updates lately! We'll however wait with trying OVZ 7 till the bugs like those reported in this thread have been solved.
I personally still see a future in LXC, which hopefully get supported some day....
I think LXC privileged is currently very unsecure and unprivileged is still experimental. So yea, nobody wants to be the first...to be hacked.
LXC unprivileged was introduced way back in 2014 with LXC 1.0 though
LXC was never designed to be multi tenant for the purpose of selling, that's why there's no proper disk space management or other useful things (a venet like interface, etc).
Francisco
It has potential, though, unless will end up like Openvzaurus after too many hacks to add VM-like features to something which is no longer needed in the day of 1-3% overhead for full hardware emulation and much better isolation.
It has potential, sure, OpenVZ 7 is just LXC with those missing pieces added. Even when OpenVZ was on 2.6.32 kernels it supported LXC 'kinda', it could start a container, add a bridged interface, and go from there.
The talk is that XFS might add some sort of multi sub quota support to try to bring some sort of disk management to LXC, but is 'df -h' going to still show accurate records? Probably not.
Francisco
So I guess it is OVZ7 then...or wait for LXD.
Or stop being such a cheap ass and pay the extra $1 for a KVM or Atom.