New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Lunanode benchmark
Recently I started working towards consolidating all my servers into cloud servers. One of the vendors I am impressed so far is lunanode. Thought I ll share bench marks for a smaller 1 GB SSD node for people who may be interested in. interpretations are upto the reader.
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 06 2017 23:02:45 - 23:30:47
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 37486483.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4456.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4382.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1035966.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 283271.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2196562.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2188034.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 368351.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10776.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9383.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1898.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4468507.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 37486483.1 3212.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4456.0 810.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4382.4 1019.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1035966.5 2616.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 283271.4 1711.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2196562.0 3787.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2188034.8 1758.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 368351.1 920.9
Process Creation 126.0 10776.5 855.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9383.5 2213.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1898.6 3164.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4468507.7 2979.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1817.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 06 2017 23:30:47 - 23:58:50
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 74735391.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8895.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9460.2 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1176185.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 321664.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2957554.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4346548.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 727311.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22017.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14168.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1967.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6166012.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 74735391.9 6404.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8895.7 1617.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 9460.2 2200.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1176185.3 2970.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 321664.0 1943.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2957554.5 5099.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4346548.1 3494.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 727311.8 1818.3
Process Creation 126.0 22017.9 1747.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14168.9 3341.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1967.3 3278.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6166012.4 4110.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2887.1
Limited number of locations is definitely a negative for them. snappy control panel is the positive. Nodes seems to be pretty good, while documentation is not the best out there. Cost is plus, while it may also turn negative for some. OVH networks has mixed reviews so does cogent. That might be a slight negative for some.
Thanked by 1yomero
Comments
I love Lunanode, just wish they had IPv6 available in their other locations instead of just Toronto.
Well, the best locations come first.... @doghouch
so how does this compare to DO or times4vps ?
Just going to say that you're necroposting
Aside from that, you should probably just roll the dice and spin up a instance on those providers and see how far you get compared to these results.