No, they’ll sell the debt to a local collection agency, who will then add their fees onto the $10.

(Quote)

seriously? you think they're gonna send a debt collector from Holland to India to collect $10?

If you dont pay, Leaseweb wont hesitate to put Some debt collectors to work

It's like herding cattle, have them work for you and sell them iPhones, fast food and bottled water, while still being in debt to you a few generations after.

No collectors company I know of would accept to even pursue that, and the court would be pissed for you to even consider to pursue it. Literally a waste of time and money here to even contemplate it.

unless its peacefull (i.e open door) . and debt collectors cannot do anything but send letters ( i suspect you do not understand this either)

@Tomz You've cancelled the servers, not the additional IPs. They're separate products. Cancel everything and pay your debt. This separation and remaining of orphan sub service products which aren't fu

It's a great advice. They secrently want it. Every call they make to him, every letter they send. Every enquiry they make this is all at the expense of the debtor, perfectly legal and very much in acc

All this over 3.98 that he will pay anyway. Or it will rise to a couple grand by the time collector fees add up over time and it goes to court.

@ricardo If a person dies, the beneficiary is responsible for taking care of the debt too.

Can be the owner has debt to he company, if the salary wasn’t drawn and the director loan was used instead, this is an option to go after the owner personally for example.

Indeed. Certainly at least in the UK, it's illegal to be trading while insolvent as you're knowingly unable to pay at least one party you're indebted to.

fix current issues with clients. and pay the debt. This is my priority's at this moment.

(Quote)

Guys sadly no luck I will complain to my old work on Monday again I did sent screenshots to one of LET admin about contacting and showing the debt. I will create tickets to clients who are affected no

What we find shameful, however, is if a company has to come to terms with a loss of 30k anyway, that it will then be "beaten on it" and everyone opens up a conflict for their $5 or $

It might be if he chose to classify his investment as a director’s loan (thus debt), then it sounds more realistic. If that’s the case, it puts any creditor to them in an even worse position since the

Well, if the op is under whatever debt, that is his concern. If the customer has failed to pay his/her invoice, will he wait to get paid and allow the customer to use service? No. Then why to wait for

I don't even believe that he is under "30k" debt. 3k maybe.