✔ EnabledRAM : 3.8 GiBSwap : 2.0 GiBDisk : 32.4 GiBDistro : Ubuntu 24.04 LTSKernel : 6.8.0-31-genericVM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ OfflineIPv4 Network Informati

Thanks for your sharing! Could you please check the motherboard model, memory model, SSD models and the PCIe interface speed of the SSDs on your 9950X server?

how are you testing the network speed? too many fails on truenetwork doesn't seem right, especially when ping worked fine. what's webping is not clear.

Disk : 1.7 TiB

So this one has a 1 Gbit downlink speed instead of the normal 100 Mbps

Will post YABS later and disk age. I think this one has a higher port speed than normal. The other server that was transferred had twice the storage than normal.

Their anti-ddos can be problematic (for example iperf3 udp test doesn't go higher than 40mbit/s for download), but they can completely bypass it (they did that for me last year, but recently i noticed

(Quote)

: 15.6 GiBSwap : 512.0 MiBDisk : 108.9 GiBDistro : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTSKernel : 5.15.0-140-genericVM Type : NONEIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6 Network Information:--

(Quote)

* 200gb drive, it’s okay, speed is average, I got no problems with that, for usual needs it’s enough

I achieve a faster speed using syncthing, worth a try

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

on both servers use newer rsync versions that support zstd compression and xxhash hashing algorithm https://blog.centminmod.com/2021/01/30/2214/fast-tar-and-rsync-transfer-speed-for-linux-backups-usin

5 - (TRIENNIAL) 20 GB disk, 1 GB RAM, 1 vCPU, 10 TB BW/mo @ 5 Gbps (Kansas City, MO)

Disk too small.

AMAZING OFFERS TO CELEBRATE RCB'S FIRST TROPHY

GorillaServers