(Quote)

most competitors still use non-RAID, single-disk setup.

* Powerful High-Speed Processors

✔ EnabledRAM : 1.9 GiBSwap : 0.0 KiBDisk : 34.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6

✔ EnabledRAM : 3.8 GiBSwap : 0.0 KiBDisk : 39.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6

Have a few servers with them for many years. Depending on what you need - if you need a fast processer and high performance disk, better steer away. They have a constant 5 - 10% CPU steal on my serv

🔹 1Gbps* Port Speed

(Quote)

: ✔ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Total Disk : 98.1 GB (3.1 GB Used) Total RAM : 7.8 GB (342.3 MB Used) Total Swap : 128.0 MB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0

(Quote)

YABS and dd, the fio test somehow appears to be cached pretty much for the HDD

Disk - 30GB SSD

Port Speed 1 GBPS

I also started with MFM and IDE drives, back when a 1.44MB floppy disk could hold 1–2 games 😄

Disk performance of the HDD also got much better after the reinstall. Maybe the Alma Image is weird, it appears to be.

For Ohio I think you can look at https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/202677/linveo-com-amd-ryzen-9-kvm-vps-with-1gb-ram-and-nvme-disk-from-2-10-month-ohio-texas-arizona

the disk io just "apt install" stucked several minutes

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)