@labze has been offering the best Shared Hosting, VPS, and Storage servers in the low-end market. All of their stuff is the latest generation CPU, RAM, and NVMe. Even if there are some rare hiccups, …

In the future I’m going to need half a dozen Turin and 9950X VPSes in EU for a month-long project and will be using HostBrr for it to give you normal pricing business.

* Hostbrr (GB 6: 2700-2800)

With HostBrr's storageboxes (which use DirectAdmin), I need both a domain name pointed to the storagebox server, and the files must be in public_html. If no domain name is pointed to the server by a D

FYI: There's now a benchmark and review available -> https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/204858/hostbrr-benchmark-incl-sql-and-review/

A (short) while ago I got myself one of the @labze / HostBrr "ECO Memory-Optimized" promo VPS, in my case a 2 vCores, 8 GB mem. one.

Hostbrr is much expensive than computebox. In the similar price range, you will struggle to run windows due lack of adequate ram and storage.

This exactly you in HostBrr's and Computebox's thread: Ohhh boohoo your service is too expensive/slow but X's service is cheaper boohoo.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

What the fuck. Missed out on every single hostbrr deal (Image)

there simply aren't any TOS, because https://hostbrr.com/terms-conditions/ is returning an error page (it's still available from web.archive.org though), and I think there's also no TOS checkbox when

(Quote)

https://my.hostbrr.com/order/main/packages/storagebox/?group_id=65 (Normal)

the second proof that the potent epic-epycs from hostbrr unfortunately have a windows problem. but it can't be the 9655 itself, because my vps based on 9655 from computebox runs great with windows se