Well if you haven't heard the news, Cloudatcost has changed their TOS. Even existing customers with lifetime plans will have to pay them $9 as yearly maintenance fee.

(Quote)

No one cares. CloudAtCost is shit, everyone knows it. Their site loads slower than molasses in January in the middle of the damn artic. Quit whining, eat the few dollars you spent, and find a less shi

Who? CloudAtCost? Never open a ticket. Everything self solved.

Hey fellas! like many here @ LET say @farsighter @DaipuX @Anatooooo -- bad bad & bad, I would strongly recommend Steering clear away from Cloud At Cost. Partly driven by ponzi/pyramid schemes…

(Quote)

http://cloudatcost.com/

Aruba is not bad. It is more than fair for the price, actually. Using them in production state. But, seriously, have you tried cloudatcost and can say it is good? Oh, my...

Sounds like a blame campaign created by someone or group of someones. Aruba - bad, CloudAtCost very bad, etc. May be competitors. Many have VPS with them and happy to have for that cost. Threats comin

(Quote)

this can be easily cured by http://cloudatcost.com/

CloudAtCost may be

May be just going with CloudAtCost at once? (Image)

(Quote)

E7 makes me thing of cloudatcost shitty stuff. Are they perhaps based in the same location, and is op trying to resell them?

(Quote)

Probably your story the same as with CloudAtCost or FDC

CloudAtCost got you covered

(Quote)

(Quote)