EnabledRAM : 967.4 MiBSwap : 1.9 GiBDisk : 56.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)Kernel : 6.12.43+deb13-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ OfflineIPv4 Ne

🔹 10Gbps Port Speed

: 926.2 MiBSwap : 512.0 MiBDisk : 19.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6 Network Informat

I keep seeing comments like this and don’t understand why. I get the past incidents with the owner and that it might leave a bad taste in people’s mouth, but I’ve had absolutely no issues in my time t

N1 Plan for $2.00/mo with Double CPU/RAM/Disk to celebrate our new website's launch! If you're interested, please DM!

I would say due to technology changes and people wanting speed.

In the real world, you should understand that backing up large disks becomes a big problem. Incremental backups can save resources for creating backups, but not for restoring full data. Restoring data

: 7.8 GiBSwap : 1024.0 MiBDisk : 96.8 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)Kernel : 6.12.43+deb13-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6 Network Infor

(Quote)

(Quote)

fps=25 video_codec=libvpx-vp9 video_bitrate=2000k deadline=realtime cpu_used=6 speed=6 row_mt=1 tile_columns=2 threads=0 lag_in_frames=0 error_resilient=1 g=25 keyint_min=12 flags=+global_header movfl

I guess that at least one major factor is (a) good and large SSDs aren't that cheap, and (b) there's only so many slots in blades and 1HU servers. Plus, to not be laughed out of the room a provider mu

Disk : 157.4 GiB

Port speed 1.0 Gbps

: 7.7 GiBSwap : 1024.0 MiBDisk : 159.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6 Network Informat

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Yes, that's allowed. It should perform well for small game servers, but just note that the single threaded speed is not as high as some of our other lineups.

* Disk : 118.1 GiB