(Quote)

(Quote)

It's been addressed before, it's actually very cheap marketing and should be treated that way.

(Quote)

They make deals that can't be refused> @Dylhost said:

(Quote)

At ~$25/year, this is the sweet spot: not bargain‑bin hardware, not oversold nodes, just solid performance at a sane price. I’ve tried the ultra‑cheap $15/year VPS options — the performance was awful.

This seems really cheap?? The RAM would sell for around that much second hand even... How did you end up with 100 of these nodes??

(Quote)

Namecheap obviously screwed up here by failing to do the early renewal, but I’d just keep in mind that no matter the registrar, there are quite a few TLDs that are absolute nightmares. Many registrars

Truth is, it’s a chasing game and it depends how much you want to suffer GEO blocking does nothing sadly, cheap rotating proxies are very accessible.

To be honest i'd guess hosts usually avoid enabling this due to the potential headache it's likely able to create for them. I mean, depending on how locked down their php installations are there might

(Quote)

Gotcha gotcha. I have a few domains with them. However, I think there is no bulletproof registrar these days. It depends the gravity of your action and who is hunting you down I guess.

Or just use @Hosteroid app to monitor domains.

(Quote)

(Quote)

It’s a tactical move to make the customer feel cheap for complaining, making it easier for the company to dismiss them.

(Quote)

And they've had a ".online special" back then, so the renewal should have been cheaper (that's why I moved the domain there).