In fact, even my own HDD based VDS (I chose higher cap but rust over (much) lower cap but SSD) isn't a snail at all. With top class providers like netcup (and presumably BuyVM) one can rely on good ca

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Here is some bench. Feel free to ask for more! What do you think of these numbers? @jsg, I know you from your benchmark, so I guess you would be pretty knowledgeable here. I am mostly surprised by sin

I really love BuyVM... But price wise Netcup seems to win easy. I mean, you want to do few stuffs so you need most space you can have and here Netcup is offering you kind of a dedicated.

As for BuyVM I never had a VPS, VDS or dedi with them but from what I've seen and heard I have every reason to believe that BuyVM is a fine provider. But for me the OP question wasn't about company A

extremely good, that was just in comparison to BuyVM's services. Also, I must disagree on your point about having more cores; while BuyVM has less cores, because they're much higher in single threade

(Quote)

(Quote)

With our "SSD8G" package that has 4 cores and is $40/mo, it worked; it wasn't buttery smooth. The customer was trying to just stream pre-recorded videos to Youtube. I don't know, it'

buyvm up 303 days

I believe their network is better than what BuyVM offers in LU (Cogent). If you need some BuyVM special features, it could be a great choice, but if you need the extra RAM & cores, NetCup's pr

I would 100% agree here. Attitude towards their customers is not great compared to BuyVM. Location and specs are better, but I would not want to host production stuff with netcup personally. Just as a

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Is BuyVM using it in production for their DDOS protected IPs?

(Quote)

For some data points from well known providers, i think BuyVM @Francisco used 8gb/physical core and Nexusbytes @seriesn uses 12gb/physical core.