New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
-
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by Aldryic ·That's pretty funny, I handle all of the DMCA requests (legit and bogus) that come in via our abuse@, and none of our nodes have been taken down over them. Maybe it's because I speak Russian and Chin -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by MrAndroid ·OVH isn't required to follow the DMCA, it just treats DMCA notices as normal copyright notices. -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by pdqso ·The point is about DMCA is one complaint, either about DMCA or "illegal activity", is more than enough to get a whole node taken down. If this is so important to you, learn Chinese o -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by Aldryic ·(Quote) -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by gsrdgrdghd ·Imho OVH should completly ignore DMCA requests since its an American law and OVH is a French company. -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by xanthi ·I'd question whether or not the DMCA applies in this usage case. I don't know a huge amount about it though - -
LEB for a Backtrack 5R1 install?
by pdqso ·You're not going to find a provider willing and if you do, it's a sign of inexperience because if they are hosted with OVH I've seen horror stories where a DMCA complaint got a whole VPS node taken of -
Sorry for Ripping sites
by Soylent ·You seem to be mischaracterizing my argument quite a bit. I'm not defending copyright violation. I'm saying you wouldn't be drawing a paycheck without a culture of copying and sharing, because that's -
Sorry for Ripping sites
by Soylent ·give money to any provider who supports the DMCA. -
Sorry for Ripping sites
by Soylent ·The internet only exists because of open standards. Issuing DMCA take down notices would make me actively not want to use a provider. I mean, you all advertise on your sites that your service is power -
Sorry for Ripping sites
by ChrisMiller ·You wouldn't be the first. I just checked CopyScape again today and it appears there is around 5 new providers using our old design. Already had to send about 25-30 different DMCA notices over the las -
Tor node on low end boxes
by BuzzPoet ·But abuse messages are just that, messages. You're assuming the one making the claim is ipso facto right. The truth is that the majority of complaints against exit nodes are DMCA notices, because they -
Tor node on low end boxes
by Maounique ·I never had DMCA complaints, but I do run tight exit policy, such as 110, 443, 995, 465, 80, 8080, things like those only. My nodes need to facilitate freespeech and anonimity, not to infringe on DRM. -
Just Inform you Hostigation have available stock
by miTgiB ·My policy is always answered with Don't be a dick, if your app passes the don't be a dick test, it's fine. Specific to torrents, DMCA 1 strike and you are out, rate limit your seeding and "D -
Tor node on low end boxes
by Steve81 ·(Quote) -
Tor node on low end boxes
by ksx4system ·Well, non-exit node is not going to cause DMCA notices. Properly configured Tor with sane bandwidth limits (4mbit/s burst speed and less than 70% monthly quota counted in gigabytes) isn't going to cau -
Needed some suggestions :D
by SpeedBus ·@NickM : Yup, I'll have to think again about starting this service as i'm the only guy who'll be running it, i'll need 2 or 3 more people to help with support and dealing with DMCA's -
Needed some suggestions :D
by NickM ·As long as you properly handle DMCA complaints, you shouldn't have a problem. -
Needed some suggestions :D
by SpeedBus ·The reason being that I dont want ton's of DMCA violating data stored on the service.. limiting the user to upload/download only his/her files will somewhat fix the issue of DMCA's I feel. -
SOPA Strike
by vedran ·And? DMCA never says they should use their "system" to remove all material, they are only supposed to remove directly reported files.