3. Local laws (ACTA, SOPA, DMCA, whatever).

I would suggest you dont. It is probably not allowed by the AuP at least and you have the whole responsibility when the police comes at your door. You wont benefit from safe harbour provisions of DMCA

In this case, the disk is hammered by running a personal torrent client. so i would side the provider. In cases such as dmca / virus / botnet etc.,, i think the provider can limit the damage by thrott

turns a blind eye until they start receiving DMCA notices. All this being said I see no reason for SeedKing to reflect badly on GridVirt which we have and continue to put so much time and effort into

Assuming you mean DMCA, there are quite a lot datacenters that ignore it - in fact, if you're not in the US, the DMCA doesn't even apply (it seems a lot of datacenters just treat a DMCA as an abuse re

(Quote)

Why should we have to deal with the 100's of DMCA's you're going to bring in if you're paying all of $5? We're all for free speech and the likes but we only have Aldryic handling admin@. The only time

Also, it's hard to be sure if a user's files are actually 'legitimate' or not unless you verify with the copyright holder if the user has permission to torrent those files. If your company supports cl

(Quote)

The difference is the person torrenting legit files isn't going to use near the disk space that the person torrenting music did. You don't count on terminating for DMCA for every user that uses over X

Okay, fair enough. But what's the difference between someone torrenting music, and someone torrenting legit files? If you have 3 people torrenting music/movies, and 10 people maxing out the HDD on t

@mitgib in my country you write newspaper, dmca not problem, man with gun problem.

(Quote)

If you don't get a DMCA notice to have it removed in the first hour (Image)

(Quote)

* The provider must be based in Outer Obscuristan, so that when they get DMCA notices about the stolen sex videos of the royal family that I host, they will ignore them.

as Canadian, making them less of a target for DMCA takedowns/complaints. See their thread here for more information on available features (listing them here would make this seem like a marketing pitc

I'm sure it was more of a liability for LET than anything else. I'm sure the last thing they want is a DMCA notice directed to a datacenter that was willing to take them during the DDOS fiasco a while

Maybe we should get some of @iwebhostu DMCA hosting and stick it on there for everyone to see (Image)

offline, then they are in the clear. (Ref: US DMCA and EU E-Commerce Directive)