Who gives you the right to do it? And how do you know a file is illegal? There are a lot of tools for snooping data. I maybe host in your server or private torrenting to another computer of mine perso

Who is the guy that can determinate what a "light pro-active monitoring" is? Is there a law for that? No. This is not an automatic detection of certain applications. GVH did not moni

IMO, there's nothing wrong with providers looking for scripts that are impacting the service for other users, but if someone's not causing any performance issues or getting DMCA notices I don't see th

If there's no DMCA and no IO abuse issues related to it, then you are right he will get away with it. We aren't going out of our way to search for people illegally torrenting, we don't have enough tim

(Quote)

(Quote)

Netherlands best bet. no DMCA law. or crap like that

If torrents are legal (ISOs from linux distros, personal files etc.) then there is no DMCA issue, so, only problem is if you abuse the bandwidth. I really cannot understand providers in this community

lol, I just mean I've either never had a DMCA notice in about 9 months of mixed private/public torrenting, or GVH just ignore them anyway.

(Quote)

You probably won't get a DMCA even if you don't use a proxy.

One question.If I use proxy with GVH(Green Value Host) Will there be any chance of DMCA?

Most of Russians has no idea what is this DMCA with copyright assfingering..

Also, we dont follow DMCA because its USA law, but we've got Russian Federation laws.

No country other than america is subject to the likes of DMCA. and i doubt any russian would stick to us laws. (just like me)

We do follow DMCA.

@Abdullah How about DMCA relationship? Depending WHOIS you a USA or shield based company but offer offshore VPS..

All Jon cares about is the DMCA notes, I asked him a few weeks back.

I don't torrent 24/7 so I'm not impacting the node, and I've never had a DMCA notice before, so I doubt they care that much

It doesn't trash the I/O nor gets you DMCA. Sorry if you did already know all this, but I find this policy very strange since BTSync is increasly common for remote storage purposes and I don't underst