Even with a cascading failure, a provider would be expected to ask you what's happening at best, and temporarily suspend the VPSes until they get an answer at worst. Straight-up terminating them witho

So yes, am learning from this incident. So now I am going through tos/fup more properly since I have ordered much more vps from the other providers here as I scale things and have already a mechanism

(Quote)

Just noticed, most of these vps were ordered and running since July, 2024. Jan/Feb this year was when they were being used as part of screenshot project and 5 got terminated on first week of march. So

I’m making this post to "self-expose" as the troublemaker who allegedly violated terms of service on a NAT VPS I recently purchased. At least, that’s how the provider sees it. Person

Hi LET,

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

We have below VPS Plan :

(Quote)

fleet). They saw some sustained cpu usage on a vps and terminated it (once again reiterating without warnings whatsoever). Now because of this termination other vps in the fleet picked up the remaini

(Quote)

Why didn't they just throttle the VPS rather than terminating it?

I ordered vps and vps every time down after some time, open ticket some days ago but dont answer. ((((

They provided me with a replacement VPS located in a different region but with the same configuration.

See https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/215850/c-servers-vps-suspended-without-notice-beware-before-buying/.

I purchased a NAT VPS from them recently, but I barely used it at all — no scanning, no brute force, no flooding, nothing of that sort.

But my point was simply to state the current status, and I'm pleased to learn that it's the same with your VPS.

Dedirock has become a mess even for $7 tiny vps server people using for timepass is not useable.