to host your zones, like www.dnsmadeeasy.com or Amazon Route 53. Until a few weeks ago i'd suggest Hexonet too, but they just announced a 1.200% (12fold!) price increase for managing external zones b

Damn! That's an Amazon server? What plan? :S

No linode, no rackspace, no amazon, etc: too expensive, only one IPv4. I looked at them regularly, especially for their offers in Japan but I didn't commit yet.

Acceptable payment options are PayPal, Credit Card via PayPal, AlertPay, Amazon Simple Pay, Google Checkout, Check/Money Order (US Funds drawn on US Bank)

Amazon S3 + Duplicity (can encrypt the backups before moving them to Amazon)

I know back in my wp.com moderator days, they gave I believe Amazon a try and moved 80% of the image content over there while keeping the top 20% local. I believe they moved it 100% back after a few

I understand that, but Amazon's cloud is still the industry standard for comparison from what I've experienced. I'm not saying they are the best because as it's been said already, finding any place th

@KuJoe -- let's be honest: Amazon's cloud is nothing to write home about. Performance, reliability, price etc, etc, etc -- all not great. They haven't been anywhere close to 100% uptime for the last 3

I noticed nephoscale.com today, which will give you a virtual server which is very much like Amazon AWS's free tier, except it looks like it's a little more generous with bandwidth.

I recently bought three small VPS packages from UptimeVPS - all small packages. I also have an amazon web services account. I have been exploring them a little as i like to learn by doing. However, i

A: We take Visa, MasterCard, Discover, Google Checkout, 2Checkout, Alertpay, Paypal, and Amazon Simple Pay.

I could use Amazon or Rackspace for the stuff I intend doing at UptimeVPS. It is quicker for me to get a cheap VPS and spend the few days doing knowning that I am not going to get a big bill if I forg

The same info Amazon or any other online book store would have.

Dosen't Amazon have the worst uptime rating, despite them saying that "Cloud" = 100% uptime.

Rackspace FTW, Amazon, and Dreamhost probably are the first that come to my mind

In this case (Amazon EC2) they actually has pretty bad CPU throttling so I presume that yes, you can max out the process pretty much 100% of the time, but you can't get much CPU juice out from it anyw

I am more familiar with Amazon EC2 instances (based in Xen), where you are assigned "virtual cores". You can use your virtual cores to their full extent without ever exceeding your a

Yeah I guess it depends on what kind of logs. I usually keep 2 weeks of access log, but just like @justinb has said, on a busy site it could be multiple GB per day, gzipped! In those cases I don't kee

Have you looked at Amazon's EC2? http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/

http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2011/08/Jekyll-amazon-s3.html