Well, still no need to made up things. Old title before op edited it, was just short non descriptive generic: "ChicagoVPS complaints".

Certainly there is a tradeoff between price and support. With Crissic, at $30/year you can get 1GB RAM and 150GB disk, but their support is superior compared with ChicagoVPS (which I believe is your c

I use to be a client of ChicagoVPS since they first appeared on lowendtalk IIRC. Initially I was very, VERY pleased with their service. But after some point I started having serious problems with basi

We offer both, chicagovps.net

Of course I did. But http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/36735/my-problems-with-chicagovps is a good recent example where people only insulted each other and used foul language, to a degree which, ev

@MattKC ChicagoVPS no longer owns 123Systems, so please stop associating it with us (Image)

(Quote)

Actually it's Chicagovps...yet another shadow purchase. (Yes, yes, newwavenetconnect is the proper parent, but that is to avoid the history associated with cvps). Search that on Google, first page r

ChicagoVPS has/uses SolusVM. They just use a SolusVM module in WHMCS.

chicagovps have it

Bottom line

(Quote)

I'm opened this Discussion try to make chicagovps have SolusVM because it is very important and because I use chicagovps since 2 Year.

My problems with chicagovps.net

ChicagoVPS was also hit hard by vulnerabilities in both sets of software - Solus vulns multiple times (which resulted in some nodes being wiped - and that's why you can't log into Solus directly there

Go to Crissic,RamNode,CatalystHost,BWH....... but dont go to GVH we have enought drama threads and 123Systems/ChicagoVPS is nearly the same.

ChicagoVPS reviews: http://goo.gl/RmAKMw

which one do u think is better?

Is this the "truth"? https://vpsboard.com/topic/1857-ugvps-thomas-dale-crystal-dale-chicagovps-dig-the-mine/

Hmm...what about this?