I honestly can't believe we're still on 1gbps.

Only used them for traffic inside Germany and it was somewhat okay considering the price. Moved to another provider since, so can't help with tests.

Don't think so.

The email provider is alive and well with @jar.

I was considering MXroute as a stable e-mail provider, so basically, only Google remains?

Just saw this company being promoted on a news portal.

They were either VAC being too aggressive and causing constant packet loss for certain ISP-s users or VAC leaking traffic under DDoS. First one got fixed pretty fast. Also it wasn't major loss. It st

I'd say it's more of a 50/50 toss up than looking at how GoDaddy, Google, NameCheap and others handled the situation you're referring to. Whole thing kicked off with them seizing domains.

I signed up out of curiosity and got wave 5...

Yeah, move on over, why have you waited so long?! A free product is a pain, not to mention those bloody forums!

I guess you do have a point but I do still think that VestaCP have poor security in general as all previous breaches have been caused by issues that are all related to poor coding practices.

Seems to be in some way. I feel like they've isolated themselves from the norms of the hosting industry and they just sort of do their own thing, which is odd considering the norms of the industry are

The way I look at it is - they're offering this service already (and have for years) and it's going over more expensive transit, so no matter what they're cutting costs. The hosts who join up win beca

Considering most of the Internet traffic are from bots, eliminating the cost of transit could have enough benefit to offset all the cost. Not to say Cloudflare will be able to stop the DDoS traffic fr

Sure but you charge CPU and right now the TB is cheaper than the CPU . I have not measure it to be honest , but may be some user has done it or someone could have an approximate idea if this could be

If you have a modern server, well compressable content (e.g. HTML and not videos) and not a huge pipe (10+Gb/s) using good compression will always offer the best trade off.

This is just way too complex for no good reason. Web site hosting should be fine with <100ms ping. If you're considering South America as well, get an East Coast US server and just one will be

What I said is that businesses around the world can't just deny service at a whimp, someone, maybe you (I don't remember or care to look it up) asked for an example, and I replied that any where anti

I need a help to understand on Rated power. Are rated power estimate made considering real power consumption of the server or just depends on server PSU?

Actually the space usually is the cheapest part, traffic comes next and power is the biggest cost factor. Plus most colos only have rather low total power per rack available, typically in the range of