* Free DNS manager

(Quote)

119.38 Mbit/s 98.589 ms Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 108.61 Mbit/s 95.41 Mbit/s 125.599 ms Spain, Madrid (MasMovil) 106.70 Mbit/s 117.62 Mbit/s 107.664 ms Italy, Rome (Unidat

Didn't put pihole on it because latency is too high for across the country for a DNS server.

(Quote)

Also get spf error when tesing with mail tester. Not sure if my dns settings are correct at my domain if someone could help.

As you can't control rDNS and there's no IPv6, people are going to point and laugh at you on IRC, for showing up with a mere IP instead of a cool DNS record, and even just an IPv4 at that.

My only gripe is that it's not possible to set Reverse DNS records for IPv6 addresses (well... the feature has been implemented in the panel now (in the past week), but the reverse DNS zone for IPv6 a

(Quote)

I dont use DNS from domain provider. I have vps, i host DNS on own server.

(Quote)

N.B: Keep in mind not to use their DNS hosting in such cases. They will receive abuse in these cases and probably suspend your domain.

123.26 Mbit/s 146.905 ms Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 64.90 Mbit/s 93.57 Mbit/s 165.688 ms Spain, Madrid (MasMovil) 67.55 Mbit/s 99.44 Mbit/s 156.586 ms Italy, Rome (Unida

No issue yet, using own DNS, despite I would not put everything on one Registar, it sounds like a fucking stupid idea, split it at least among a few.

Yeah, sure, Notify/AXFR/IXFR is usually the way to go. I was just making a more general point about how, for most use cases, all the dns servers must be kept roughly in sync, and equally available (i.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Generally speaking. Who on earth would want to copy and paste DNS records?

Small twist: If you on the one hand want to run a DNS server yourself, maybe for gaining experience, but on the other hand to not run 2 (or more) DNS servers yourself you can look out for a service wi