IPv6 traffic - on a fairly rudimentary test - looks to be fractionally faster than IPv4 to most destinations. I've definitely never seen scale v6 "failures" any more often than v4.

(Quote)

(Quote)

Bro you can't just start pulling excuses to ignore the data out of your butt, as soon as it's data you don't like.

(Quote)

Apparently, no one is unaffected by the RAM shortage. Even NVIDIA stops supplying VRAM modules to GPU partners (allegedly, reportedly and other ly): https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/nvi

If it helps, I see a roughly similar proportion of v6 / v4 traffic going out of my router at (UK) home; very little of that will be automated traffic from Big Corporate...

From November 28, 2025 to December 1, 2025, at 00:00 GMT+8 (Singapore Time) you can claim double transfer data on this plans BASIC AP CPU, BASIC NA CPU, VPS BUDGET (ALWAYS PROMO). Submit a support tic

This is questionable. Is that 52.87% of connections or actual users? And it's unknown how much of that is Googles' own automated traffic from their systems. They don't even mention but for last 30 day

* 50GB NVMe Storage

I guess not, its not profitable to rent soda can per month, but yeah some other sell low to get customers, (and then gone in the next 3 month)

out of stock...

This year we decided to offer 3 different plans, Performance HDD EPYC 9754 with NVME caching, Performance AMD Ryzen 9950X NVME and shared hosting!

(Quote)

Stop doxxing me (Image)

(Quote)

Welp yeah, my ISP doesnt really like ipv6, its routing is so bad, need to use CloudFlare WARP but yeah, for web CloudFlare DNS Proxy work fine

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)