Also the discussion started from Linode statistics which are probably 90% servers too.

(Quote)

Maybe just with linode customers. not all servers as a whole. since it is vps, maybe people like latest software without compiling, thats why ubuntu.

Is that based on Linode's customer base though? If so then I would not see that as anything more remarkable than their clients swing towards one particular distro.

Dallas, TX: 7.42MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.78MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, NL: 9.02MB/sDownload speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 10.8MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singap

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3,80MB/s

This is a statics from Linode

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4,35MB/s

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 10,9MB/s

If you just batch you zone file updates, like to them every fifteen minutes (like Linode does) it'll prevent the constant reloading. Also prevents the SOA serial running out of bounds with a large num

Use Linode London as source: [root@ ]# wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin --2013-07-23 04:15:43-- http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin Resolving spee

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.65MB/s

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.23MB/s

intovps.com , linode.com , ramhost.us , anynode ,....

Linode is irrelevant here, I'm talking about the most common SolusVM+WHMCS LEB provider case.

You havent seen the Linode's implementation of Xen (Image)

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.19MB/s

Dallas, TX: 8.63MB/sDownload speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.79MB/sDownload speed from i3d.net, NL: 4.56MB/sDownload speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 4.86MB/sDownload speed from Softlayer, Singapore

> Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.59MB/s

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.59MB/s