(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Don't Google cloud and Azure both get a lot more outages than Amazon though?

Ok thanks. That's the impression I am getting. I would rather do business with Amazon than Microsoft all other things being equal. I will take another look at Google Cloud too I guess.

I hear ya. I normally thought that too. However, I think cloud providers like Amazon are more well financed and have a lot more technical support. I am finding a lot of the dedicated server guys ar

(Quote)

paying for each individual thing. So more like Amazon AWS I guess.

With dedicated, sooner or later these guys all go offline for one reason or another and sometimes they are slow to respond. Amazon seems more solid in that respect

Yes I googled "best alternatives to Amazon EC2" and a few variations. So I have seen a lot of those hits.

P.s. Btw I meant to write Amazon EC2, not S3.

(Quote)

if you are really going to run in for a some sort of test drive for less than 1 month, better go with DO/Vultr/Amazon S3, they charge hourly.

Closest thing I found is Amazon Route 53, it's $0.5/m if the query counts is below 1 million I think.

Add Server/Node works for CentOS 7 KVM Hosts Only, no plans for other Hypervisor types though I am meditating about Xenserver 7 since it is now open sourced and has the big bucks (Amazon et al) behind

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias=aps&field-keywords=+openvpn+router&rh=i:aps,k:+openvpn+router

I think you're all undervaluing the service here...sure, Amazon S3 is 1/10th the price, but if you run low on space will they lend you some more? I didn't think so. And remember, your data has a &

Ah. I see the catch. Amazon Glacier isn't available on the free tier so you'd need to upgrade to a more expensive tier which you wouldn't use.

(Quote)

(Quote)