Postfix isn't all too hard to configure, really. If that is holding you back from setting it up, don't worry; there are plenty of guides around to help you do that. Have a look at Ars Technica's, whic

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 8.09MB/s

Dallas, TX: 57.1MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.85MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 10.6MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 3.45MB/s Download speed from So

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.58MB/s

This isn't Linode but if you are saying that's what I need to be paying to avoid similar situations then fine. I didn't realise $90/y was looked on as being such a poor product, even by their own staf

That is budget. Even the most basic Linode offers is $20/month, so more than 2x $90/year.

Dallas, TX: 45.2MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.76MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 6.84MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.0MB/s Download speed from Softl

Dallas, TX: 47.3MB/sDownload speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 8.09MB/sDownload speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 3.54MB/sDownload speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 8.38MB/sDownload speed from Softlayer

Dallas, TX: 71.3MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 13.6MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.06MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 2.07MB/s Download speed from Softl

Are YOU tired of:

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 8.92MB/s

(Quote)

(Quote)

Dallas, TX: 43.3MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.52MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.8MB/sDownload speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 9.76MB/s Download speed from Softla

@mpkossen why have a limit at all? Why have geographic boundaries when it comes to pricing? For example VPSBoard got spawned last year, never had a limit for offers and prices didn't go crazy. My poin

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.48MB/s

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.5MB/s

The virtual cores are not a 1-1 mapping with physical cores. I can attempt to simultaneously use all allocated 8 virtual cores on my cheapest Linode but the reality is I won't see true 8 way paralleli

once a node is full and guests are active, Linode/DO both have the deployment numbers and experience from the vast number of deployments to get this right (or as close as). Number of virtual core doe

than X hrs" or if they can pull off DO/Linode style where only extreme/deliberate resource abuse ignites a call to action. It will probably be many months before we can gauge this, not only