Of course Netcup has every right to refuse any client they like. But they should come up with more reasonable ways to handle identity verification. In fact, any document can be forged, so how are they

Oh hey, I just noticed this is very similar to Netcup offer of a week or so ago. I'm not worked up about the slightly older cpu generation. I guess the similarity is evidence that this is a sane off

(Quote)

(Quote)

We can find a nicer word than "racism" but I referred to @Whoa's quoted statement. My point was btw not to accuse him of anything but rather to emphasize that netcup is not based on

Well, @Whoa (who you're replying to) did add "Understandable, though". He was reporting his experience more than he was complaining about netcup, and he didn't mention racism.

Evil, evil netcup.

It is not all that bad though. Atleast Hetzner, Netcup and PHPFriends are going stronk. Not only in terms of pricing but also performance, reliability and popularity. They have managed to offer dumpin

Thanks for answers. Ok, HostHatch, BuyVM, NetCup and Wishosting are provably liberal what comes to CPU usage. Bacloud would be an excellent choice as well if the cheapest Pro version had half the pric

Same thing with netcup root servers.

How about NetCup, HostHatch and BuyVM? I couldn't find any concrete facts about their CPU policy, they all seem to offer "fair" CPU usage for all users.

as premium products and they cost a lot more. Netcup's are amazingly affordable but they are in Germany, are monthly-only, have various issues with complicated cancellations and charging you EU VAT

I've had a Root-Server from netcup since last Easter and I've used IPv6 since the beginning, and I can't say that I've ever experienced the lag that you mentioned. In my experience, IPv6 works fine.

So? I didn't judge your IPv6 comment. I personally don't care and think that IPv6 will never really take off but I accept that others like you have a different view. So, if NetCup's IPv6 really is poo

Are you sure that this isn't just a case of comparison porn disillusion? I have a smaller root server (spindles, not SSD) with netcup and yes, iops is, depending on slice size, "only&quot

For an entire HDD, yes. An HDD shared between tens of users can be pretty awful, especially as capacities increase without iops increasing. I wouldn't run any live service from an HDD VPS these days

What is the network setup on netcup KVM instances?

(Quote)

Problems with Netcup infrastructure I've noticed last year still apply.

(Quote)