The only problem with amazon ses is that it forces me to send only a limited number of emails in a second. I can send as much as I want with sendgrid.

I used Amazon AWS earlier with 4000 IOPS disk and a lot of CPU and RAM, but still our websites were too slow to load and simple shop pages could take 7-15 seconds to generate and load in browser. They

Amazon SES works great for us, no deliverability issues, and it's quite cheap... been on Sendgrid before, but they often had blacklisted IPs issues.

I am moving to Amazon SES from Sendgrid (because it's cheap as hell) and I am interested to know if it's worth it.

If it's just for testing as you say then perhaps Amazon spot instances would be a better fit?

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

If you need a server right that second with dedicated resources then you should by from a provider that also does hourly billing like packet.net or Amazon.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

not trying to be a downer, but for me these closing shops is happening too often. Too much time and energy is spent trying to find a budget host, while vultr/linode/DO/lightsail/etc all provide good

7 and upwards (unless you backport libssh). Amazon Web Services used this statement as an explanation why they are not supporting SSH-ED25519 yet, but they probably would come up with a similar bulls

(Quote)

(Quote)

Amazon Cloud Drive

Amazon Drive of course, it's unlimited. Just mount it and add encryption on top, then you can put owncloud, WebDAV or whatever else you want. It's a no brainier to go with anyone else.