that's what $36,000 is for

3000 affected users but only offer to rebuild 400 VPS, then what about the rest of 2600 affected users?

If the services have little chance of coming back (based on cociu's poor handling of communication and selling off of in-use customer assets), then @vibhakti is unfortunately, not wrong in considering

Maybe one day Hosthatch will offer their $10/month 10 TB plan again, and you could stack 10 of them to get 100TB for $100/month. I think they said they likely won't offer that plan again any time soon

This exact kind of language is in a lot of ToS, so its likely they copied it from elsewhere

One provider here has sold ip's that paying customers still use, has like a month of downtime without any kind of communication or information except for sending out new offers, deletes thousands of t

I'm not saying he shouldn't have had it stripped, more so that I hold the opinion that it was taken a little bit early considering all the years of his participation and contributions to this communit

(Disclosure: I'm one of their customers; nothing to complain about till now; btw IIRC en-us is not their first language which may explain the harsh unusual phrasing of the TOS)

Cause that would imply that he cares about the customers.

Considering he is saying they are being sold after an upgrade why havent the customers been moved over?

Other drives still there, so someone probably bought those. We are still in the Chia-hype

Considering that he is 100% reading this thread - he probably took it off, cause it contradicts the "involucration" statements he made.

They take his money for services provided, yet they do this, and try to poach his customers..

I know my vote means very little in the big picture, but obviously go for Idaho. Already plenty of providers in Montreal on OVH, and already one (or maybe more) running on Hive there.

Either Montreal (non OVH) or Coeur d'Alene, ID

Which location are you considering??

This does seem like a bit of waste of power and CPU time, but yeah given it's HG, I don't think many people would care.

I guess so but in all fairness it's probably a virt layer over a fully dedicated server. They likely did it for ease of deployment. I know feelings about that vary but IMO as long as it isn't shared I

@jbiloh I've let Tony know about the performance issue already.

Yer damn right.