Or just don't use Amazon and their pay for every little thing and do everything our way service that ends up costing much more than you think if you just use a little math.

Using amazon cost calculator with 1TB transfer in per month and 1TB inter region transfer out is $225

All available for a price. There are primarily price sensitive services and then there are services like Amazon s3. Apples and oranges.

Amazon S3 offers more for a better price.

(Quote)

(Quote)

Why do cost sensitive people still consider Amazon S3 for backup? It's way more expensive than other solutions when you run the numbers for anything other than minimal storage. If your storage requi

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-s3-object-expiration/

(Quote)

(Quote)

How can i get which file is older than 30 days if amazon is not mounted?

I forgot to mention, my scripts deletes all files older than 30 days in the webdav mount. I want to have something similar. I want amazon s3 to work just like this scenario. Is it possible?

I am using Hetzner's first storage plan (100gb) for some server backups. I am thinking of switching to Amazon S3 because I want to pay for resources I use and not more.

F1 product for truly enormous SQL databases, and Amazon has something like it called Redshift, which is Postgres-based.

They use Amazon DNS. Maybe you mean their server wasn't up.

So, you're expecting some super-fast resolution; the likes you'd get off Amazon etc with bottomless pits of money off a provider that's clearly not as large. OK. No-one can expect a resolution like OV

compared with their main competitors. Even AWS lightsail has a $5 instance now, that maybe came before Linode's.

Edit: Check /r/datahoarder - lots of folks that did like Amazon -> GDrive moves with Rclone on a scaleway instance.

(Quote)

]> Just don't set all of the iPads to amazon.com. Apparently I'm the only one that thought that was funny.