you appear to be pitting Amazon SES against mxroute.io, but there was no need to do this in the given context. It would have been sufficient to mention Amazon SES as a potentially cheaper option, depe

Nevertheless, my opinion still is that Amazon SES is a lot cheaper and a suitable solution for at least some use cases, at least mine and possible of the OP.

the thread only after you kept insisting that Amazon SES is cheaper.

(Quote)

(Quote)

This thread was about one VPS sending e-mails for which Amazon SES is a suitable and cheap solution, much cheaper than MXroute.

(Quote)

I have yet to see a rejection when sending with Amazon SES, so that is not a "pretty huge" difference and not worth ten times more money.

(Quote)

You have made that statement directly or indirectly twice now, so please enlighten me which advantages the MXroute SMTP relay plans have over Amazon SES and what makes it worth about 10 times the pric

(Quote)

I don't see any extra features in the MXroute SMTP relay plans compared to what Amazon SES offers. The cheapest MXroute plan is just about 10 times more expensive.

(Quote)

The chance you'll need support from Amazon for an SMTP relay is about zero because they will keep the platform running at all times for lots of (big) customers and presumably have many employees 24 ho

Good luck getting Amazon to bother replying to your tickets with no canned replies unless you pay for the premium support.

I should have mentioned all the ones I've tried till now. I've tried Vultr, DO, Amazon AWS and Lunanode (OVH).

The cheapest MXroute SMTP relay plan lets you send 2000 emails/month for €20/year. You can do that via Amazon SES for just $0.20/month, so your yearly costs would be $2.40, which is a lot cheaper than

Thank you but I already tried this one as well haha. I should have mentioned all the ones I've tried till now. I've tried Vultr, DO, Amazon AWS and Lunanode (OVH).

(Quote)

(Quote)