Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6,77MB/s

9.|-- speedtest.newark.linode.c 50.0% 10 102.6 103.0 102.4 104.4 0.8

See also https://www.linode.com and http://iwstack.com/.

I use NixStats, New Relic Server Monitoring, and Linode Longview (it's free even for non-linode servers)

How about linode, digital ocean , vultr , ramnode , secure Dragon or buy vm?

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.43MB/s

My london server to speedtest.newark.linode.com -- > 89ms

(Quote)

speedtest.newark.linode.com. I can post an MTR for you. Hang on.

(Quote)

I'm sorry, but what kind of fucked up network are you on? I'm used to getting <100ms from Linode in NJ all the time and I'm living further away than you do.

I had a look a Linode, their East Coast location comes back in the 250-300m/s range.

One of my Linode server is allocated /48 and it work well with /64 but doesnt work with /112.

(Quote)

I often read quality as Linode.

Dallas, TX: 5.39MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 30.4MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.15MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 10.4MB/s Download speed from Softl

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.33MB/s

Dallas, TX: 7.08MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.73MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.60MB/sDownload speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 2.78MB/s Download speed from Softla

Linode Digital Ocean Vultr are the lowest you should consider matching. With that said openvz hosts are a dime a dozen. You'll really have to have something special in that market.

And btw, some plans at linode can give you more cores for your money and they are faster (E5-2680 v2 (2.8Ghz) and v3 (2.5Ghz) at least in my instances).