Thanks for the recommendations so far, I'll look into each one tomorrow, everyone else feel free to post if you have a provider to recommend.

They still active (they are using other datacenters in Sweden curious...)

As I checked the offers that were sent here i'm considering moving to hostbrr lol While Asura's downtime is not "that" bad anymore it's getting very annoying.

I googled and saw the same, also, look at their news section, died off nearly 10 years ago (just a few in the last 10 years)

My main arguments were/are, summarized

I'm talking about carriers that haven't dropped them already. Pickings are going to be slim! Assuming they are/will stick around and/or other carriers don't take the same stance on other questionable

Of course, by all means. I just meant I didn't want the thread closed due to name calling or anything that seemed to be happening earlier. I've only skimmed the thread, haven't read it in full.

It's a public thread, I don't see the harm in discussing as to why they did what they did?

Experienced Professional Seeking Job in WHMCS Management, Customer Support, DNS Management, cPanel/WHM, and Proxmox Installation

I agree, but I think if they make a 7$ monthly plan that would help the host because customers would usually stay for couple of months at least, also it won't be that much expensive for the customer.

It’s actually $60/year as there are no monthly plans and that’s not a small amount to gamble with especially for a service like this.

It is actually 5$/month

It's literally $6/month, it's not "too expensive" at all. I only needed 2 TB of storage but went for 4,5 TB because no other provided could offer a better price

then at least lower storage plans (the smallest 4.5TB is too big/expensive to start with new provider, considering all these issues with his network and outages)

Thanks for the test. Seems ping is too damn high ...

For someone using BunnyCDN. I get a friendly 339ms ping to you.......

And you are Croat since when?

You can't provide those forms considering that they don't exist.

Maybe tunnel one of them to a Kimsufi dedi that can only have one ipv4, I don't know if that would work but I have been considering trying this in order to run proxmox without NAT on a Kimsufi. Probab

Sure; I'll throw my in as well. I've been in the industry on and off for a bit over 20 years (I've got an Aug 2003 WHT account), and a bit of a server nerd, so that might help add some credence.