i have one i could possibly rent out , it was planned for cancellation but price increase happened so i kept it

Why? Honestly: even though LET community did suggest against it, we picked the most generic word in virtualization and paid for it daily. You can't Google the product, reviews of us return VMware docs

* We have both AMD and Intel in our Own infra, we posted multiple offers here in LET with both CPU. Mostly our Intel CPU is Intel 8269CY and AMD is EPYC 7K62

Assuming they own the domain. And the subdomain was in control of someone else that used it to host that site. It is still weird to suspend that vps which didn't even host it.

Do you actually control your_example.com? Anyone can point a domain they own (or even a subdomain) to any IP address, so a hosting provider generally shouldn’t suspend your VPS merely because an unrel

All the Leaseweb VPS we sell is directly from LSW, And leaseweb is using KVM with cloudstack, and we use their API to display management panel to our users.

I’m currently on a RakSmart hosting plan and ran into a confusing situation.

Lol there's no such hidden-gem VPS provider, if they are in VPS biz their IPs are already datacenter/hosting. Get ultra cheap broadband connections dedicate uplinks to mini raspberry pi and host your

There is also another reason, if your vps will use high CPU for certain period, leaseweb apply limit, due to which also steal time may show.

im still missing the actual technical details. i want to know what actually happens under the hood.

I understand what you’re saying about the incoming rules. However, having no one able to connect to the node does provide an additional layer of protection. Those rules also cannot be edited from the

Well, being around this world for quite a time this is really the first time I come around the "LW thinks 20% steal is normal". And the response was from your support and not speakin

Anyway, you clearly don't know what a sole trader is or why they're legally required to use their name.

not some teenager running VPS in their parents basement

Besides DeluxHost, the services I have where AS name contains their own name are:

1- Each account runs as its own Linux user inside its own chroot jail one account's process physically cannot see or touch another account's files.

no shit i just realized its open source too, gg man.

(Quote)

ah yes, true. Each box has got its own domain, so the only way is to use a different domain but then it is not really a proper failover. I was hoping there is some solution to this from PM but I guess

Certainly worth considering outbound rules in general for certain systems. I do have 1 particular server that has some, let's call it, paranoid lockdown on it